Keith Keller wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2003-12-19, Fred Emmott <pcfreak65@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> oops just realised i didn't sign lsat one - its from me
>
> That's wonderful, but signing your posts isn't terribly helpful if your
> public key isn't available.
>
> - --keith
>
> - --
> kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
> (try just my userid to email me)
> AOLSFAQ=http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/cgi-bin/fom
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQE/4m1YhVcNCxZ5ID8RAmXtAJ9ItYSmW2LBD9fhperZNfTmRlM2+w CfR31d
> Txbu9LL11rA5HHWF1l4Pa0U=
> =juFB
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

subkeys.pgp.net
--

Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect.
--- Linus Torvalds

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

dcba@dcba.dcba.org wrote:

> AthlonRob <junkmail@axpr.net> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
>
> pgp trash troll delete
>
>> Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote:
>> > Fred Emmott <pcfreak65@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >> oops just realised i didn't sign lsat one - its from me
>
>> > That's wonderful, but signing your posts isn't terribly helpful
>> > if your public key isn't available.
>
> Signing your posts isn't terribly helpful even if your key is
> available. Could you please refrain from using pgp in situations
> where it is not warranted?
>
> Thank you.
>
> cordially, as always,
>
> rm

Hows this - I'm now being forced to use Suse for a little while (not sure if
it appears in the headers), but you can tell I'm not using the same usenet
client. (knode rather than thunderbird) - which would make me think either
the person posting was pretending to be me, or I was trying to make people
think someone was pretending to be me, in order to post insulting things
and say "Look at the headers! Wan't me!"

- --

Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect.
--- Linus Torvalds
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQE/4tklDvn9hyzHIq4RAlEWAJ42Dl9hJZ5a/YI1hwX44+pulQxqRgCYzxBk
8KyG0+Xbo53Hm+gPWCs2mw==
=J/12
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

begin quote: Jurgen Philippaerts wrote:
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 07:34:28AM PST, TKS wrote
> in article <1e06d7.0312180734.351ceddc@posting.google.com>:
>
>> > > Completely ignore the ones who complain about pgp and don't reply
>> > > to them or worry about it.
>
>> > And we'll completely ignore _you._
>> > Plonk!
>> > cordially, as always,
>> > rm
>
> hold on here for a minute...
> did trollboy just plonk someone ?
>

More importantly, did trollboi just use a plural pronoun?
Dear gods, the voices in his head are mulitplying.


--
"Why would burgulars need to look for a backdoor when they can climb in
through Windows?" --Norman L DeForest, in NANAE
"You know how dumb the average luser is? Well, half of 'em are dumber
than that" -- The Roadie, in NANAE

In <kJudnWydocdSVn-iRVn-uw@speakeasy.net>, Guy Macon wrote:

>
> Guy Macon says...

> How much do you want to bet that trollboy complains that I used PGP to
> sign the above post when I clearly did not? <grin>

You win
Franz

--
Franz M. Sauerzopf
Atominstitut, TU Wien

Jurgen Philippaerts <jurgen@see.my.pgp.key> says...

>> How much do you want to bet that trollboy complains that I used
>> PGP to sign the above post when I clearly did not? <grin>
>
>we already know that he has no clue about what he's talking about, he
>prooved that himself quite alot of times already. why bother to
>remove him from the killfile and find out

Oh, I have no intention of removing him from my killfile (unless
it's to win a bet...). His posts a deadly dull. Boring. Sleep
inducing. Zzzzzz... A short quote from an existing post, one or
zero lines of comment on the quote (and not clueful comments,
either) then a cut-and-paste anti-PGP section. Eliza has more
variety and content than that. So does the Microsoft Paperclip.
Anyone who keeps reading the same post over and over needs to
get a life.

notbob <notbob@nothome.com> wrote:
> I think we should all start using pgp/gpg. Maybe the sorry fuck will
> get tired of having to respond to every post.

I probably will in the near future, just to annoy him.
As far as I know "tin" - which I'm using now - doesn't support it,
but I may be wrong (just switched to SW 9.1 and it again has a newer
version of tin).
--
************************************************** ******************
** Eef Hartman, Delft University of Technology, dept. EWI/TW **
** e-mail: E.J.M.Hartman@math.tudelft.nl, fax: +31-15-278 7295 **
** snail-mail: P.O. Box 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands **
************************************************** ******************

Jurgen Philippaerts <jurgen@see.my.pgp.key> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1

pgp trash troll delete

> we already know that he has no clue about what he's talking
> about, he prooved that himself quite alot of times already. why
> bother to remove him from the killfile and find out

We know what we're talking about. And this is just pure trolling.

BTW: could you please refrain from using pgp unless it is
absolutely necessary? Show some respect for the other posters.

cordially, as always,

rm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

dcba@dcba.dcba.org wrote:

> Jurgen Philippaerts <jurgen@see.my.pgp.key> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>
> pgp trash troll delete
>
>> we already know that he has no clue about what he's talking
>> about, he prooved that himself quite alot of times already. why
>> bother to remove him from the killfile and find out
>
> We know what we're talking about. And this is just pure trolling.
>
> BTW: could you please refrain from using pgp unless it is
> absolutely necessary? Show some respect for the other posters.
>
> cordially, as always,
>
> rm

Yes, we know this is just pure trolling, just like all of your other posts
rm.
- --

Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect.
*****---*Linus*Torvalds
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/4xWkDvn9hyzHIq4RAiXbAJ9Yq/r/M1VFRuIjuPxVVgpSZNBsVgCfXeAk
91YlUKUncUPCWk60sPTLI+o=
=+loA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Fred Emmott <pcfreak65@hotmail.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1

pgp trash troll delete

> dcba@dcba.dcba.org wrote:

> Hows this - I'm now being forced to use Suse for a little while
> (not sure if it appears in the headers), but you can tell I'm not
> using the same usenet client. (knode rather than thunderbird) -
> which would make me think either the person posting was
> pretending to be me, or I was trying to make people think someone
> was pretending to be me, in order to post insulting things and
> say "Look at the headers! Wan't me!"

Nobody cares. But people do care about the unwarranted use of pgp.
You know this. You know better. Please show some respect for the
other posters and restrict your usage of pgp to situations that
actually require it.

Thank you.

cordially, as always,

rm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

dcba@dcba.dcba.org wrote:

> Fred Emmott <pcfreak65@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>
> pgp trash troll delete
>
>> dcba@dcba.dcba.org wrote:
>
>> Hows this - I'm now being forced to use Suse for a little while
>> (not sure if it appears in the headers), but you can tell I'm not
>> using the same usenet client. (knode rather than thunderbird) -
>> which would make me think either the person posting was
>> pretending to be me, or I was trying to make people think someone
>> was pretending to be me, in order to post insulting things and
>> say "Look at the headers! Wan't me!"
>
> Nobody cares. But people do care about the unwarranted use of pgp.
> You know this. You know better. Please show some respect for the
> other posters and restrict your usage of pgp to situations that
> actually require it.
>
> Thank you.
>
> cordially, as always,
>
> rm

I only know one person who cares - namely you. I assume your reason for the
use of 'people' - a plural term - is the same unknown reason as you
addressing yourself continually as 'we' rather than 'i'.

Fred

- --

Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect.
*****---*Linus*Torvalds
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/4xatDvn9hyzHIq4RAvd0AJ4ygD00RoV5dGgh/YxwSxEy+OGepQCePNG4
gPe76kRQJGsqxCaZlxdI0AQ=
=0R4s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----