'''
(0 0)
+------oOO----(_)-------------+
| Please don't feed the Troll |
+--------------------oOO------+
|__|__|
|| ||
ooO Ooo

On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 10:37:40 +0000, *@*.* <*@*.*> wrote:
>
>
>
> '''
> (0 0)
> +------oOO----(_)-------------+
> | Please don't feed the Troll |
> +--------------------oOO------+
> |__|__|
> || ||
> ooO Ooo
>
>

I've noticed, Sam, that the people who most often call people "trolls" are
in fact trolls.

What do you think?

Are you amused by the fact that all the bullies on this newsgroup
think that they don't have to conform to the Usenet guidelines?

For some reason, they think that this newsgroup is on their own private
newsserver instead of the Usenet.

But, I guess they just don't have any choice, do they, lacking the
technical expertise to run their own server.

Besides, if they had their own server they wouldn't be able to so rapidly
replace all the people they drive away with their pathetic games of
dominance.

Pretty soon it would just them, sitting with their thumbs up their
asses wondering where everyone went.

Then there's be a little civil war and that would be the end of the
slack newsgroup.

I guess I can sympathise with them.

See you later, Sam.

Pretty cool ascii art....

AC

In news:0gXEb.11911$0s2.152@newsread2.news.pas.earthl ink.net,
Gang Green <ecothrill@greenpeace.org> rambled:
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 10:37:40 +0000, @ . < @ . > wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> '''
>> (0 0)
>> +------oOO----(_)-------------+
>>> Please don't feed the Troll |
>> +--------------------oOO------+
>> |__|__|
>> || ||
>> ooO Ooo
>>
>>
>
> But, I guess they just don't have any choice, do they, lacking the
> technical expertise to run their own server.
>
> Besides, if they had their own server they wouldn't be able to so
> rapidly replace all the people they drive away with their pathetic
> games of dominance.
>
> Pretty soon it would just them, sitting with their thumbs up their
> asses wondering where everyone went.
>

http://tinyurl.com/28urt
--
Billy

"Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?"
Uh, I think so, Brain, but balancing a family and a career ... ooh,
it's all too much for me.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2003-12-21, Billy Watt <newsspam@cjwatt.plus.net> wrote:
> In news:0gXEb.11911$0s2.152@newsread2.news.pas.earthl ink.net,
> Gang Green <ecothrill@greenpeace.org> rambled:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/28urt

Please don't feed the kooks, either.

- --keith

- --
kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
(try just my userid to email me)
AOLSFAQ=http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/cgi-bin/fom

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/5gjohVcNCxZ5ID8RAmEVAJ4oiFcFKnzZEzRlHYkoZw+czEQB6w Cfbq95
Rj5H5yPtkI7K8E8dztcm4PM=
=mSMQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1

pgp trash troll delete

> On 2003-12-21, Billy Watt <newsspam@cjwatt.plus.net> wrote:
> > In news:0gXEb.11911$0s2.152@newsread2.news.pas.earthl ink.net,
> > Gang Green <ecothrill@greenpeace.org> rambled:
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/28urt

> Please don't feed the kooks, either.

Why is it necessary to produce 15 lines of off-topic garbage for
this one line? And why aren't you posting this using your
"anonymous" pseudonym?

Please refrain from the unwarranted use of pgp in the future.
Observe netiquette. Be considerate of the other posters.

cordially, as always,

rm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2003-12-21, Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> rambled:
>
> On 2003-12-21, Billy Watt <newsspam@cjwatt.plus.net> wrote:
>> In news:0gXEb.11911$0s2.152@newsread2.news.pas.earthl ink.net,
>> Gang Green <ecothrill@greenpeace.org> rambled:
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/28urt
>
> Please don't feed the kooks, either.
>

Well, OK fair enough, I just couldn't resist it ;-)


- --
"Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/5jSKoOMCLVDeF1sRAv8QAJ4s90Hzzcei+qq91xpjNBew/d86sgCg5VUL
sHOQE4iifMiDfdM5s8fv3EI=
=QvU1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Billy Watt <newsspam@cjwatt.plus.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1

pgp trash troll delete

> On 2003-12-21, Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> rambled:
> >
> > On 2003-12-21, Billy Watt <newsspam@cjwatt.plus.net> wrote:
> >> In news:0gXEb.11911$0s2.152@newsread2.news.pas.earthl ink.net,
> >> Gang Green <ecothrill@greenpeace.org> rambled:
> >>
> >> http://tinyurl.com/28urt
> >
> > Please don't feed the kooks, either.
> >

> Well, OK fair enough, I just couldn't resist it ;-)

If you want to respond to us just use an "anonymous" name the way
that Old Yeller does.

BTW: your use of pgp inline violates usenet netiquette and the
policy of this ng. Please show some consideration for other
posters by refraining from using pgp unless it is absolutely
necessary.

Thank you.

cordially, as always,

rm

begin quote: Gang Green wrote:
>
>
> Are you amused by the fact that all the bullies on this newsgroup
> think that they don't have to conform to the Usenet guidelines?
>

Another idiot who talks about "Usenet guidelines" that run contrary to
the RFCs?

Change your sock, this one's starting to stink.

<plink>

--
"Why would burgulars need to look for a backdoor when they can climb in
through Windows?" --Norman L DeForest, in NANAE
"You know how dumb the average luser is? Well, half of 'em are dumber
than that" -- The Roadie, in NANAE

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 01:09:05 +0000, dcba adumbrated:


>
> Why don't you ask the pgp trolls to stop using pgp?
>
> cordially, as always,
>
> rm


plonk!