Unix Technical Forum

ATI Rage 128 & DRI support

This is a discussion on ATI Rage 128 & DRI support within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Last night I recompiled my 2.4 kernel and added agpart into the kernel & the ati rage driver as ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Slackware Linux Support

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 07:56 AM
RayzrShrp
 
Posts: n/a
Default ATI Rage 128 & DRI support

Last night I recompiled my 2.4 kernel and added agpart into the kernel
& the ati rage driver as a module. I ran lsmod and sure enough the
agpart and r128 were both listed as running yet when I attemtped to
run x the logs showed this:

(II) R128(0): Acceleration enabled
(==) R128(0): Backing store disabled
(==) R128(0): Silken mouse enabled
(II) R128(0): Using hardware cursor (scanline 2052)
(II) R128(0): Largest offscreen area available: 1280 x 5525
(II) R128(0): Direct rendering disabled
(==) RandR enabled
Symbol drmAgpBase from module
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved!
Symbol drmGetInterruptFromBusID from module
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved!
Symbol drmCtlInstHandler from module
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved!
Symbol DRIGetDeviceInfo from module
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved!
Symbol drmCtlUninstHandler from module
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved!

now I assume the R128(0) is a good sign showing that the x server is
indeed using the r128 module for the driver. My question is what is
the unresolved stuff all about?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 07:57 AM
Danno
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: ATI Rage 128 & DRI support

RayzrShrp wrote:

> Last night I recompiled my 2.4 kernel and added agpart into the kernel
> & the ati rage driver as a module. I ran lsmod and sure enough the
> agpart and r128 were both listed as running yet when I attemtped to
> run x the logs showed this:
>
> (II) R128(0): Acceleration enabled
> (==) R128(0): Backing store disabled
> (==) R128(0): Silken mouse enabled
> (II) R128(0): Using hardware cursor (scanline 2052)
> (II) R128(0): Largest offscreen area available: 1280 x 5525
> (II) R128(0): Direct rendering disabled
> (==) RandR enabled
> Symbol drmAgpBase from module
> /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved!
> Symbol drmGetInterruptFromBusID from module
> /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved!
> Symbol drmCtlInstHandler from module
> /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved!
> Symbol DRIGetDeviceInfo from module
> /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved!
> Symbol drmCtlUninstHandler from module
> /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved!
>
> now I assume the R128(0) is a good sign showing that the x server is
> indeed using the r128 module for the driver. My question is what is
> the unresolved stuff all about?



Does adding the following 4 lines to /etc/X11/XF86Config help?

# If using the kernel's agpgart, enable DRI for everyone
Section "DRI"
mode "666"
EndSection




--
Slackware9.1, 2.4.24, A7V333-XP2100+, Ti4200
RLU #272755
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 08:00 AM
Fritz Wuehler
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: ATI Rage 128 & DRI support


rayzrshrp@tds.net (RayzrShrp) writes:

> Last night I recompiled my 2.4 kernel and added agpart into the kernel
> & the ati rage driver as a module. I ran lsmod and sure enough the
> agpart and r128 were both listed as running yet when I attemtped to
> run x the logs showed this:
>
> (II) R128(0): Acceleration enabled
> (==) R128(0): Backing store disabled
> (==) R128(0): Silken mouse enabled
> (II) R128(0): Using hardware cursor (scanline 2052)
> (II) R128(0): Largest offscreen area available: 1280 x 5525
> (II) R128(0): Direct rendering disabled
> (==) RandR enabled
> Symbol drmAgpBase from module
> /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved!
> Symbol drmGetInterruptFromBusID from module
> /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved!
> Symbol drmCtlInstHandler from module
> /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved!
> Symbol DRIGetDeviceInfo from module
> /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved!
> Symbol drmCtlUninstHandler from module
> /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o is unresolved!
>
> now I assume the R128(0) is a good sign showing that the x server is
> indeed using the r128 module for the driver. My question is what is
> the unresolved stuff all about?



I dont know if this aplies to you at all maybe someone else will know better
but I had problems with my ATI R128 card when setting up a tv tuner card, I found
the GATOS drivers through google, installed them and everything is just super.

You can check it out here

http://gatos.sf.net

The Gatos drivers replace the drivers you mention above.
You will need Xfree V4.3 though, the improvement I saw is very good.











Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com