Naota wrote:

> On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 17:53:01 -0700, Guy Macon wrote:
>
>>>Is this even possible?
>
>>A new moderated newsgroup would have to be created.
>
> If no one makes a moderated group if we cannot moderate a.o.l.s, we can
> have weekly or monthly postings of certain users' killfiles.
>
> I'm personally very interested in seeing what some of the veterans' score
> files look like.

Sure but that would be giving away how I've managed to block that certain
tard completely from my view

--
"And what will you do when you grow up to be as big as me?"
asked the father of his little son.
"Diet."

Naota wrote :

> If no one makes a moderated group if we cannot moderate a.o.l.s, we can
> have weekly or monthly postings of certain users' killfiles.

I don't think thats an good idea. Making our filters public is not just a
help to others who want to filter. Its an excellent HOW-TO avoid the
filters too.
--
Thomas O.

This area is designed to become quite warm during normal operation.

Thomas Overgaard <thover@post2.tele.dk> wrote:
> Naota wrote :

> > If no one makes a moderated group if we cannot moderate
> > a.o.l.s, we can have weekly or monthly postings of certain
> > users' killfiles.

> I don't think thats an good idea. Making our filters public is
> not just a help to others who want to filter. Its an excellent
> HOW-TO avoid the filters too.

Most of you clowns who brag about filters are too bloody lazy to
write one and you just don't want to give yourselves away.

cordially, as always,

rm

Wild Wizard <yea@right.com> wrote:
> Naota wrote:
> > On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 17:53:01 -0700, Guy Macon wrote:
> >
> >>>Is this even possible?
> >
> >>A new moderated newsgroup would have to be created.
> >
> > If no one makes a moderated group if we cannot moderate
> > a.o.l.s, we can have weekly or monthly postings of certain
> > users' killfiles.
> >
> > I'm personally very interested in seeing what some of the
> > veterans' score files look like.

> Sure but that would be giving away how I've managed to block that
> certain tard completely from my view

So if that is the case why do you even bother reading a thread
about moderation? You have everything under control, right genius?

I never could stand those people who took nicknames from the
Tolkien type garbage.

cordially, as always,

rm

Realto Margarino <boogie@eewwww.org> writes:

> I never could stand those people who took nicknames from the
> Tolkien type garbage.


And that is somehow worse than taking it from one form of domestic
toast-lubricant?

Glyn
--
RTFM http://www.tldp.org/index.html
GAFC http://slackbook.yoshiwara.org.uk/
STFW http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...inux.slackware
GAFL http://www.xemacs.org http://www.gnus.org/

Glyn Millington <wistanswick@linuxmail.org> wrote:
> Realto Margarino <boogie@eewwww.org> writes:

> > I never could stand those people who took nicknames from the
> > Tolkien type garbage.

> And that is somehow worse than taking it from one form of domestic
> toast-lubricant?

That's not where it came from. Why is it that so many computer
people take names from a mythical time when computers did not
exist? People who truly understand computing, Gandalf Inc,
notwithstanding, know that there is absolutely nothing magical
about a computer.

cordially, as always,

rm

Glyn Millington wrote:

> Realto Margarino <boogie@eewwww.org> writes:
>
>> I never could stand those people who took nicknames from the
>> Tolkien type garbage.
>
>
> And that is somehow worse than taking it from one form of domestic
> toast-lubricant?

Wouldn't have seen his post if it weren't for you .... read on

My nick predates those movies as well as those stupid Harry Potter ones
which I have also been accused of using as inspiration. My nick originates
from a series of computer games which I can't be bothered listing here as
only some clueless halfwit has currently made a comment about it and until
I am asked a serious question by a serious person I'm not telling.

--
The meta-Turing test counts a thing as intelligent if it seeks to
devise and apply Turing tests to objects of its own creation.
-- Lew Mammel, Jr.

Wild Wizard <yea@right.com> writes:

> Glyn Millington wrote:
>
>> Realto Margarino <boogie@eewwww.org> writes:
>>
>>> I never could stand those people who took nicknames from the
>>> Tolkien type garbage.
>>
>>
>> And that is somehow worse than taking it from one form of domestic
>> toast-lubricant?
>
> Wouldn't have seen his post if it weren't for you .... read on

Sorry - it takes me a while to become sufficiently irritated by this chap
in his latest guise to actually score him out ... again ... and the
temptation to reply is too much at times.

But I am hardening ;-)


Glyn
--
RTFM http://www.tldp.org/index.html
GAFC http://slackbook.yoshiwara.org.uk/
STFW http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...inux.slackware
GAFL http://www.xemacs.org http://www.gnus.org/

On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 08:40:02 +0000, Wild Wizard wrote:

> Sure but that would be giving away how I've managed to block that certain
> tard completely from my view

Yeah, forget the idea. I just learn by example.
--
naSota@tPampabay.rAr.cMom - > (remove 'S P A M')

On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 10:41:05 +0200, Thomas Overgaard wrote:

> I don't think thats an good idea. Making our filters public is not just a
> help to others who want to filter. Its an excellent HOW-TO avoid the
> filters too.

I never thought of that. I tend to think of spammers as random,
machine-like posters who never actually read posts.

--
naSota@tPampabay.rAr.cMom - > (remove 'S P A M')