Unix Technical Forum

Realistic system req

This is a discussion on Realistic system req within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> what are the realistic system requirements for slackware? If I do replace the workstations I need to be able ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Slackware Linux Support

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 10:33 AM
Liam Marshall
 
Posts: n/a
Default Realistic system req

what are the realistic system requirements for slackware?

If I do replace the workstations I need to be able to do essentially what
I did under windows. That is, office apps, typing programs, surfing for
research, etc, and basic programming. I need to know the minimum system
requirements to do this.

My slowest machine in the lab now does these thing with 450 MHz and 64 MB
ram. Most other machines are far faster but I still have 6 of these acers
left that we won't upgrade for a while, except maybe memory
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 10:33 AM
/dev/rob0
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Realistic system req

On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 03:23:18 -0500, Liam Marshall wrote:
> what are the realistic system requirements for slackware?
>
> If I do replace the workstations I need to be able to do essentially what
> I did under windows. That is, office apps, typing programs, surfing for
> [snip]
> My slowest machine in the lab now does these thing with 450 MHz and 64 MB


If you want to run KDE I think a 450 is enough CPU, but you'll want
more RAM. You could set up a non-"desktop environment" window manager
and live happily on such a machine as it is, but that would require
some configuration and user adaptation.

My kids are running KDE 3.1 on a 400 with 284MB. It's adequate.

If you have one really good machine on the network, and a good Fast
Ethernet (100Mbit) LAN, you could have users run their X apps on the
good machine and paint the pictures on the low-powered box. This should
work quite well, except that it goes against the popular concept of a
"personal computer".
--
/dev/rob0 - preferred_email=i$((28*28+28))@softhome.net
or put "not-spam" or "/dev/rob0" in Subject header to reply

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 10:33 AM
Realto Margarino
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Realistic system req

Liam Marshall <lsrpm@mts.net> wrote:
> what are the realistic system requirements for slackware?


> If I do replace the workstations I need to be able to do
> essentially what I did under windows. That is, office apps,
> typing programs, surfing for research, etc, and basic
> programming. I need to know the minimum system requirements to
> do this.


> My slowest machine in the lab now does these thing with 450 MHz
> and 64 MB ram. Most other machines are far faster but I still
> have 6 of these acers left that we won't upgrade for a while,
> except maybe memory


I run slack 9.0 on a 200mmx with 128 megs and a 2 meg video card.
I run X with fvwm/xfce/icewm/windowmaker and firefox or opera. For
a wordprocessor I use abiword although openoffice is doable (I no
longer write academic papers). I work mostly from the CLI.

cordially, as always,

rm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 10:33 AM
/dev/rob0
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Realistic system req

On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 03:46:06 +0000, Realto Margarino wrote:
> I run slack 9.0 on a 200mmx with 128 megs and a 2 meg video card.
> I run X with fvwm/xfce/icewm/windowmaker and firefox or opera. For


Do you find that browsing is annoyingly slow? That's how I felt toward
the end of my days on a P166 workstation. Back then (about 1.5 years
ago) it seemed that none of the browsers were very friendly to weak old
CPU's. I used Opera mostly. "links -g" was the best for system
resources, but a bit odd to work with in numerous ways.

> a wordprocessor I use abiword although openoffice is doable (I no
> longer write academic papers). I work mostly from the CLI.


Just curious, ignore if you wish (of course ... what was/is your
field?
--
/dev/rob0 - preferred_email=i$((28*28+28))@softhome.net
or put "not-spam" or "/dev/rob0" in Subject header to reply

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 10:33 AM
Ken
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Realistic system req

On 2004-04-13, Liam Marshall <lsrpm@mts.net> wrote:
> what are the realistic system requirements for slackware?
>
> If I do replace the workstations I need to be able to do essentially what
> I did under windows. That is, office apps, typing programs, surfing for
> research, etc, and basic programming. I need to know the minimum system
> requirements to do this.
>
> My slowest machine in the lab now does these thing with 450 MHz and 64 MB
> ram. Most other machines are far faster but I still have 6 of these acers
> left that we won't upgrade for a while, except maybe memory


My primary desktop is an old, 6 year old, Dell P2 256 something or other
with 64 megs of ram...it runs slack 9.1 without a hitch. That said, I also
avoid KDE and Gnome (don't like them anyway) and use fluxbox. Prior to
installing slack, I used Mandrake 9.x and used Star Office. Took a while to
load the office app, but once it was loaded...no real problems with speed.

It's how you install and what you have running ...

ken
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 10:33 AM
JM
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Realistic system req

Liam Marshall wrote:

> what are the realistic system requirements for slackware?
>
> If I do replace the workstations I need to be able to do essentially what
> I did under windows. That is, office apps, typing programs, surfing for
> research, etc, and basic programming. I need to know the minimum system
> requirements to do this.
>
> My slowest machine in the lab now does these thing with 450 MHz and 64 MB
> ram. Most other machines are far faster but I still have 6 of these acers
> left that we won't upgrade for a while, except maybe memory


I am building a wireless access point on a k6 333 mhz machine. I had a 30
gig drive and a bunch of memory so I put it in and installed everything in
9.1. I'm running KDE as my window manager and it all works fine. I'm sure
if I used a window manager like blackbox it would be even faster.

I think if you upgraded the memory you would be fine for just about
anything you wanted to do. Try to get as much as you can to reduce
swapping to disk. On the K6 I am using I put 512meg into it only because I
had it. After I am done with the setup and compiling I think I will pull
256meg out of it for another machine.

Joseph

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 10:33 AM
Alan Hicks
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Realistic system req

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In alt.os.linux.slackware, Liam Marshall dared to utter,
> My slowest machine in the lab now does these thing with 450 MHz and 64 MB


Damn I wish that was the slowest machine I've loaded slackware on!
Everything you have will run slackware fine to one degree or another.
You may want a little more RAM though.

- --
It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise,
Than for a man to hear the song of fools.
Ecclesiastes 7:5
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAe2mBL3KiNGOqr6ERAu/dAJ90O5yHz0nHcb0yBioAoDESStTimwCfR68x
UhH8PFDSQmzh0rS4jz+5xZo=
=Zjbt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 10:33 AM
Guy Macon
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Realistic system req


Liam Marshall <lsrpm@mts.net> says...

>My slowest machine in the lab now does these thing with 450 MHz and 64 MB
>ram. Most other machines are far faster but I still have 6 of these acers
>left that we won't upgrade for a while, except maybe memory


Here is an interesting idea for you to think about; combine two of your
older machines to make a faster machine that shares the work. Look here:
http://www.volny.cz/basiclinux/oldpc/
http://www.volny.cz/basiclinux/oldpc/x-on2.html


--
Guy Macon, Electronics Engineer & Project Manager for hire.
Remember Doc Brown from the _Back to the Future_ movies? Do you
have an "impossible" engineering project that only someone like
Doc Brown can solve? My resume is at http://www.guymacon.com/

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 10:33 AM
notbob
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Realistic system req

On 2004-04-13, Liam Marshall <lsrpm@mts.net> wrote:
>
> My slowest machine in the lab now does these thing with 450 MHz and 64 MB
> ram.


I'm running a 433 celery. Plug in .5G ram and you be fine.

nb
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 10:33 AM
Menno Duursma
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Realistic system req

On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 03:23:18 -0500, Liam Marshall wrote:

> what are the realistic system requirements for slackware?
>
> If I do replace the workstations I need to be able to do essentially what
> I did under windows. That is, office apps, typing programs, surfing for
> research, etc, and basic programming. I need to know the minimum system
> requirements to do this.


I'd say a Pentium-II with *lost* of RAM will do, even for KDE cq GNOME.

> My slowest machine in the lab now does these thing with 450 MHz and 64 MB
> ram.


That shouldn't be much of a problem. Two machines i helped out with their
lately: one has AMD k6-2, 96meg - other i586 233mmx 192meg. Now the latter
is noticeablely more "snappy" then the former, it just boots slower...

(Both run Slackware 9.1 with some tweaks and KDE desktop (no KDM though.))

> Most other machines are far faster but I still have 6 of these acers
> left that we won't upgrade for a while, except maybe memory


I'd recomement the memory upgrade. If their supposed to stay in service
for some jears to come (and why not?). The SDRAM DIMM modules you can
probably still get at the local hardware shop today!

HTH.

--
-Menno.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com