"Daniel Rudy" <dcrudy@invalid.pacbell.nospam.net.0123456789> wrote in
message news:aSUec.51065

> Furthermore, Intel doesn't have a x86 native 64-bit processor like AMD
> has, so right now AMD is the only game in town. Even better, because
> AMD has caught Intel with their pants down with the unexpected market
> demand for native x86 64-bit computing hardware, Intel, who doesn't even
> have a comparible product yet, has *COPIED*, or "Reverse Engineered" the
> Opteron chip so they can get a product to market faster so they can
> compete with AMD. This is a first ever for Intel who are the ones who
> usually sets standards in computing hardware.

Cool! Way, way, way, way, WAY Cool! Meta-orgasmically Cool! Supercali-
fragilisticexpialidociously Cool!

I believe I'll have another beer! %-)

> Will Microsoft beat Linux? Probably not. Will Linux beat Microsoft?
> Probably not. Microsoft is not going away anytime soon, but neither is
> Linux. Microsoft should embrace Linux and make an offical version of
> WINE, or even better, publish their own distribution of Linux.

What another rush! I just had this flash of Bill Gates on national TV,
saying something like, "OK, we lose. Now you can get Microsoft(r) Linux -
free, with optional famous Microsoft(r) Tech Support! Comes with MSN,
Microsoft(r) Linux Explorer, ..."

Damn! Them's good drugs!

Cheers!
Rich