This is a discussion on compile kernel-2.6.5 questions [slackware 9.1] within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> 1. Do I need to compile in ram disk support for Slackware 9.1 when compiling a new kernel? (Is ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| 1. Do I need to compile in ram disk support for Slackware 9.1 when compiling a new kernel? (Is it required for Slack 9.1 to boot normally?) 2. Anyone noticed a 20 second delay during boot when apgart module is loaded on this kernel? - I read somwhere it needs to be a module if you are going to use nvidia's video driver? (dunno if this is true or not, but I did it to be safe) -- Regards garbage garbagedisposal@despammed.com |
| |||
| garbagedisposal <garbagedisposal@despammed.com> wrote: > 1. Do I need to compile in ram disk support for Slackware 9.1 when > compiling a new kernel? (Is it required for Slack 9.1 to boot normally?) No, it is only needed when making a bootable FLOPPY kernel image, to be able to load "the 2nd (and next) floppies" somewhere. Hard disk boots can load the rest FROM that disk (which is too slow for floppies, and anyway, you must be able to switch floppies, so its contents have to be copied "somewhere else"). -- ************************************************** ****************** ** Eef Hartman, Delft University of Technology, dept. EWI/TW ** ** e-mail: E.J.M.Hartman@math.tudelft.nl, fax: +31-15-278 7295 ** ** snail-mail: P.O. Box 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands ** ************************************************** ****************** |
| |||
| On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 12:47:07 +0000, Eef Hartman wrote: > garbagedisposal <garbagedisposal@despammed.com> wrote: >> 1. Do I need to compile in ram disk support for Slackware 9.1 when >> compiling a new kernel? (Is it required for Slack 9.1 to boot normally?) > > No, it is only needed when making a bootable FLOPPY kernel image, to be > able to load "the 2nd (and next) floppies" somewhere. > Hard disk boots can load the rest FROM that disk (which is too slow > for floppies, and anyway, you must be able to switch floppies, so its > contents have to be copied "somewhere else"). Ta' Eef ! -- Regards garbage garbagedisposal@despammed.com |
| |||
| "garbagedisposal" <garbagedisposal@despammed.com> wrote in message news > 1. Do I need to compile in ram disk support for Slackware 9.1 when > compiling a new kernel? (Is it required for Slack 9.1 to boot normally?) > > 2. Anyone noticed a 20 second delay during boot when apgart module is > loaded on this kernel? - I read somwhere it needs to be a module if you > are going to use nvidia's video driver? (dunno if this is true or not, but > I did it to be safe) > > -- > Regards > garbage > garbagedisposal@despammed.com I had absolutely no problem compiling in the kernel as opposed to a module. My nVidia G2 MX 400 says happy things when it runs, and in the README for the graphics driver in linux, it says it will use agpart if available, but if it isn't, won't use it, or some business like that. I don't recall seeing anything saying it NEEDS to be a module, just that it will auto-load the module if it needs to have it installed Jon |
| ||||
| On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:10:10 +0000, J McK wrote: > > "garbagedisposal" <garbagedisposal@despammed.com> wrote in message > news >> 1. Do I need to compile in ram disk support for Slackware 9.1 when >> compiling a new kernel? (Is it required for Slack 9.1 to boot normally?) >> >> 2. Anyone noticed a 20 second delay during boot when apgart module is >> loaded on this kernel? - I read somwhere it needs to be a module if you >> are going to use nvidia's video driver? (dunno if this is true or not, but >> I did it to be safe) >> >> -- >> Regards >> garbage >> garbagedisposal@despammed.com > > > I had absolutely no problem compiling in the kernel as opposed to a module. > My nVidia G2 MX 400 says happy things when it runs, and in the README for > the graphics driver in linux, it says it will use agpart if available, but > if it isn't, won't use it, or some business like that. I don't recall seeing > anything saying it NEEDS to be a module, just that it will auto-load the > module if it needs to have it installed > > Jon Thanks Jon, before compiling I did soem research on the Slackware forum sites & saw some crying about nvidia / apgart & advice to make it a module. I think I will recompile & include it in the kernel this time. C'Ya -- Regards garbage garbagedisposal@despammed.com |