Unix Technical Forum

X.org vs. XFree: performance

This is a discussion on X.org vs. XFree: performance within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Hello, I see some people already switched to X.org. Do you see significant difference in "visible" performance, CPU and ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Slackware Linux Support

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 11:54 AM
Jacek =?ISO-8859-2?Q?K=2E_B=B3aszkowski?=
 
Posts: n/a
Default X.org vs. XFree: performance

Hello,
I see some people already switched to X.org. Do you see significant
difference in "visible" performance, CPU and memory usage between XFree and
X.org? I wonder if I should switch to X.org too, but for now XFree works
just fine for me.

regards, jkb
--
Jacek K. Błaszkowski
GAT/L/MU d+ s+:+ a-- C++$ UL++$ US+> P L++ E--- W+ N++ o+ K- w+$ O?
M> V? PS+ PE++ Y-- PGP++ t 5? X R tv b++++ DI++ D+ G e h-- r++ y++
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 11:54 AM
jenso
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: X.org vs. XFree: performance

On 2004-05-31, Jacek K Błaszkowski <cdlxxvi@NOSPAM.ds2.pg.gda.pl> wrote:
> Hello,
> I see some people already switched to X.org. Do you see significant
> difference in "visible" performance, CPU and memory usage between XFree and
> X.org? I wonder if I should switch to X.org too, but for now XFree works
> just fine for me.
>
> regards, jkb

I think X.org is the better choise. Works perfect on
three different boxes. But I don't do gameing.

/Jens
--
Slackware-current | CRUX-1.3.1 PPC
| udev

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 11:54 AM
Mark Hill
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: X.org vs. XFree: performance

On Mon, 31 May 2004 15:06:24 +0200,
Jacek K Błaszkowski <cdlxxvi@NOSPAM.ds2.pg.gda.pl> wrote:

> I see some people already switched to X.org. Do you see significant
> difference in "visible" performance, CPU and memory usage between XFree and
> X.org?


I haven't noticed any difference in CPU and memory usage. (Although I
haven't done any proper tests, just looked at top.) Responsiveness and
application loading times look to be the same also.

> I wonder if I should switch to X.org too, but for now XFree works
> just fine for me.


I only changed over as I keep up with -current.

--
Mark Hill <usenet@mark.ukfsn.org>
GPG KeyID: 4A3B58AC
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 11:54 AM
Wild Wizard
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: X.org vs. XFree: performance

Jacek K. B?aszkowski wrote:

> Hello,
> I see some people already switched to X.org. Do you see significant
> difference in "visible" performance, CPU and memory usage between XFree
> and X.org? I wonder if I should switch to X.org too, but for now XFree
> works just fine for me.


expect problems if you use the nvidia driver, when you quit X the console
colours are screwed up (problem compounded on each start and shutdown of
the X server)

oh and the config file has changed name .... ffs

--
Anybody can win, unless there happens to be a second entry.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 11:54 AM
steveo
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: X.org vs. XFree: performance

On Mon, 31 May 2004 15:06:24 +0200, Jacek K. Błaszkowski
<cdlxxvi@NOSPAM.ds2.pg.gda.pl> wrote:

> Hello,
> I see some people already switched to X.org. Do you see significant
> difference in "visible" performance, CPU and memory usage between XFree
> and
> X.org? I wonder if I should switch to X.org too, but for now XFree works
> just fine for me.
>
> regards, jkb



Running Slack-Current too, no problems at all. Somebody mentioned
possible issues with nvidia, but I have'nt seen any (ut2004 looks perfec).

Also, the /etc/X11/XF86Config is now /etc/X11/xorg.conf as already
mentioned, but I just used my old XF86Config so really its no bother at
all.

AFAIK xorg have fixed many bugs which xfree did not, so for some people
xorg is going to be even more stable anyway.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 11:54 AM
Mark Hill
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: X.org vs. XFree: performance

On Mon, 31 May 2004 15:45:03 GMT,
Wild Wizard <yea@right.com> wrote:
>
> expect problems if you use the nvidia driver, when you quit X the console
> colours are screwed up


I don't have this problem here. I'm using the nvidia driver with a TNT2
M64.

> oh and the config file has changed name .... ffs


Yeah, but this can be remedied quite quickly with cp, ln or mv at least.

--
Mark Hill <usenet@mark.ukfsn.org>
GPG KeyID: 4A3B58AC
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 11:55 AM
Max
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: X.org vs. XFree: performance

On 05-31-2004, in alt.os.linux.slackware,
Mark Hill <usenet@mark.ukfsn.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 31 May 2004 15:45:03 GMT,
> Wild Wizard <yea@right.com> wrote:


>> expect problems if you use the nvidia driver, when you quit X the
>> console colours are screwed up


> I don't have this problem here. I'm using the nvidia driver with a
> TNT2 M64.


Just what nvidia drivers are being discussed here?. The OSS versions
or the proprietary kernel tainting ones direct from nvidia. I use
the kernel tainting modules from nvidia here with Xfree86. I'd
indeed like to know what to expect with the nvidia prop. drivers and
x.org. Can anyone comment?

Hopefully, by the time the next version of Slack shows up, issues
(if any) relating to nvidia and x.org will be cleared up.

Max

--
____ ____ ____
||M |||A |||X ||
||__|||__|||__||
|/__\|/__\|/__\|
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 11:55 AM
dedhed
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: X.org vs. XFree: performance

On Mon, 31 May 2004 23:21:06 +0000, Max wrote:

> On 05-31-2004, in alt.os.linux.slackware,
> Mark Hill <usenet@mark.ukfsn.org> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 31 May 2004 15:45:03 GMT,
>> Wild Wizard <yea@right.com> wrote:

>
>>> expect problems if you use the nvidia driver, when you quit X the
>>> console colours are screwed up

>
>> I don't have this problem here. I'm using the nvidia driver with a
>> TNT2 M64.

>
> Just what nvidia drivers are being discussed here?. The OSS versions
> or the proprietary kernel tainting ones direct from nvidia. I use
> the kernel tainting modules from nvidia here with Xfree86. I'd
> indeed like to know what to expect with the nvidia prop. drivers and
> x.org. Can anyone comment?
>
> Hopefully, by the time the next version of Slack shows up, issues
> (if any) relating to nvidia and x.org will be cleared up.
>
> Max


I use the NVIDIA drivers from NVIDIA and x.org and have had no ill effects
at all. Everything works perfectly, just as it always did.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 11:55 AM
Jonathan A.
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: X.org vs. XFree: performance

On Tue, 01 Jun 2004 01:03:44 GMT, dedhed
<dedhed@pir2.org> appears to have said:

> On Mon, 31 May 2004 23:21:06 +0000, Max wrote:
>
>> Just what nvidia drivers are being discussed here?. The OSS versions
>> or the proprietary kernel tainting ones direct from nvidia. I use
>> the kernel tainting modules from nvidia here with Xfree86.
>>
>> Max

>
> I use the NVIDIA drivers from NVIDIA and x.org and have had no ill effects
> at all. Everything works perfectly, just as it always did.
>


What do you use on the VT? A raw VGA console? The rivafb driver for
framebuffer? Generic framebuffer? IIUIC, the problems that people have
been reporting switching between X and the VC while running the NVIDIA
proprietary drivers have generally been attributed to some conflict
between the NVIDIA X driver and the rivafb driver.

Anyone have comments on that? Anyone running a plain VGA console and
*still* having problems? I'd like to know, because I've been holding
off on upgrading to the newest version of the evil NVIDIA binary-only
driver for just this reason but, if the VC switching problem truly
doesn't affect those who run a raw VGA console, then I should be OK.

ciao,
Jonathan

--
Don't just hit reply. Email address is broken. Thank
your friendly neighborhood spammer. Email replies to:
user: jnthn1 domain: earthlink<dot>net
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 11:55 AM
Mateusz Marzantowicz
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: X.org vs. XFree: performance

Hello,

Could you tell me how long does it take to switch from XFree to X.org?
Did you found any problems doing that?
It's important for me because I'm very busy and don't know if it have a
sence to do that.

Thanks
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com