This is a discussion on The Internet under surveillance / 2004 report within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Read the full report at : http://www.rsf.org/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=433 Reporters Without Borders has published its annual report on the state of ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Read the full report at : http://www.rsf.org/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=433 Reporters Without Borders has published its annual report on the state of online freedom in more than 60 countries - The Internet Under Surveillance. The rights of Internet users, webmasters and online journalists have been substantially curbed since the 11 September 2001 attacks in the United States. The fight against terrorism has led to stricter monitoring of Internet traffic in both democracies and under authoritarian regimes. Four countries throw people in jail for posting "subversive" topics online - China (with 63 cyber-dissidents in prison), Vietnam (7), the Maldives (3) and Syria (2). Censorship of online publications is steadily increasing and dictatorships are developing more and more sophisticated ways of filtering the Internet. China and Vietnam are experts in the field. But the regimes in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Tunisia and Turkmenistan also block access to a very wide range of websites, including those featuring pornography, independent magazines, banned religions and human rights. Cuba, Burma and North Korea have even harsher policies and restrict Internet access to a tiny minority of citizens rather than set up costly monitoring systems. Democratic countries have steadily chipped away at the freedom of their Internet users. This involves laudable aims, such as fighting online paedophilia, helping dismantle terrorist networks and protecting cultural industries against piracy. But governments are having trouble reconciling users' rights to message privacy and freedom of expression with more and more serious financial and security concerns. As a result, Internet freedom is now much less legally protected than that of the traditional media in most democratic countries. |