This is a discussion on new support site for slackware. within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> pgp trash troll delete Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > On 2004-06-25, ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| pgp trash troll delete Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > On 2004-06-25, chris king <phiber@slackwaresupport.com> wrote: > > Subject: Re: 10. > > From: "Patrick J. Volkerding" <volkerdi@slackware.com> > > Date: Wed, June 16, 2004 12:47 pm > > To: "chris king" <phiber@slackwaresupport.com> > > Priority: Normal > > > > On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, chris king wrote: > >> Hey Pat, > >> > >> Is 10. gonna support the AMD64????? > > > > I'm runnning it on my AMD64. :-) > Natively, or in 32bit mode? > - --keith > - -- > kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us > (try just my userid to email me) > AOLSFAQ=http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/cgi-bin/fom > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) > iD8DBQFA27WGhVcNCxZ5ID8RAtlMAJ95HunZ99HsGu1GB7Ojr0 rY7kbhzwCeO8bc > R4+UIzujGI3cejxNCLy7xu8= > =DxcV > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| |||
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In alt.os.linux.slackware, George Georgakis dared to utter, > Legally, yes. But then, legally you aren't allowed to tape a TV show > without permmission. I doubt Pat will do something that basically > qualifies as Slackware propoganda. I'd guess that he's more > concerned about people hijacking the name and then muscling him off > his own intellectual property. For the record, Pat has never complained once about the Revised Slackware Book Project hosted on my web server (and before that, Carl's server). We quite clearly on the front page say that Slackware and linux are registered trademarks... blah blah blah. I think that if you go ahead with this, he may feel that you're stepping on his toes and just elect not to do anything about it, but I wouldn't bet on that. The safe and proper thing to do is change the name to something that's obviously not offiliated with Slackware. The aforementioned website is slackbook.lizella.net, and as such could be a book about just about anything. Until you visit the site you don't know what it's about, and as soon as you visit it you are told that this is an unofficial, unaffiliated with Slackware project. Slax (www.slax.org) used to be www.slackware-live.org, but Pat enforced his trademark rights and Tomas (I believe that's the guy's name, too lazy to google) gave in after awhile. Pat had asked that the name be changed, and that he preferred that it not even begin with "Sl". IIRC, without any further coorespondence with Pat, Tomas changed the name to Slax and nothing's been said about it since. So there you have it; two opposite yet strangely related projects (both are based off a product that Slackware Linux Inc. sells after all), both with different results. I think the results are largely due to the way the participants handled things. In my case, I wrote Pat and explained what we were doing, and he even offered some modest assistance. I don't think Tomas went through with that, but if he had e-mailed Pat and discussed it beforehand, perhaps he wouldn't have gone through the awkward name change period. - -- It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise, Than for a man to hear the song of fools. Ecclesiastes 7:5 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA3djFlKR45I6cfKARAozDAJ97ULocYRkyNoiRyM+Q0/bTKNy3MACeJ5jR PPdzcoyFUk8RclXJNNW/qP0= =WLCa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| |||
| Ann wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 00:33:43 -0500, Scott Cole wrote: > .... > Also, the "Slackware linux" logo on your website is remarkably similar to > the original on the official Slackware website. No indication that > permission was give to use it and it's not used as a link to the Slackware > website. No, he drew it up himself. He's an excellent artist you know. > > I don't see anything wrong with having a website about Slackware; there > are many websites about MS Windows. But imo you should not be using > copyrighted material without permission and you should have a disclaimer > on your website. And, since you are selling advertising, a policy to > contribute a percentage to the Slackware project would be appropriate. > |
| |||
| chris king wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 13:21:47 -0700, Dennis Kibbe wrote: .... > > > > the right thing? its just a name. its a support site for slackware linux. > what support-for-slackware.com? > > Hey man, check out my really cool web site! Click Here: http://www.microsoft.com I really work hard on MY new website! It took me ten years to build it. Finally, it's ready for the public. tell me what you think. |