Unix Technical Forum

ZipSlack 10: can't write to mounted vfat files system

This is a discussion on ZipSlack 10: can't write to mounted vfat files system within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> For some reason I get a 'read-only file system when attempting to write to a Fat32 volume. Here's my ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Slackware Linux Support

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 01:20 PM
rufo
 
Posts: n/a
Default ZipSlack 10: can't write to mounted vfat files system

For some reason I get a 'read-only file system when attempting to
write to a Fat32 volume. Here's my fstab entry for the device I wish
to write to:

/dev/hdd5 /phoebe vfat noauto,user,umask=0 0 0

Here's the output from mount:

/dev/fd2 on / type umsdos (rw)
proc on /proc type proc (rw)
devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620)
usbfs on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw)
/dev/hdd5 on /phoebe type vfat
(rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,umask=0,user=bp)

Here's the response to rm /phoebe/junk.txt:
rm: cannot remove `/phoebe/junk': Read-only file system

mount says it's rw, but rm says it's ro.

ZipSlack is on /dev/hda3.

Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 01:21 PM
HJohnson
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: ZipSlack 10: can't write to mounted vfat files system

rufo wrote:
> For some reason I get a 'read-only file system when attempting to
> write to a Fat32 volume. Here's my fstab entry for the device I wish
> to write to:
>
> /dev/hdd5 /phoebe vfat noauto,user,umask=0 0 0

^^^^^^^^
should read:
,umask=000

You need to alter the mask for Group and User, as well as root.
>
> Here's the output from mount:

- - - - < snip > - - - - - -
>
> Suggestions?



--

humjohn AT aerosurf DOT net
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 01:21 PM
Alan Hicks
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: ZipSlack 10: can't write to mounted vfat files system

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Don't you people ever read the FAQ?
http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/cg...t&_minMatches=

- --
It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise,
Than for a man to hear the song of fools.
Ecclesiastes 7:5
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA6z7zlKR45I6cfKARAnN6AKCA8VB5pdg34MuR/s2q4C9MMpbkiQCfWgbA
KLytEOuDTfWTPfUYg/zAd7Y=
=0pL7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 01:22 PM
Two Ravens
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: ZipSlack 10: can't write to mounted vfat files system

Alan Hicks wrote:

> Don't you people ever read the FAQ?

Judging from the threads on "How do I change from KDE to Gnome" or vice
versa, no they don't!
--
Two Ravens
"...hit the squirrel..."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 01:22 PM
rufo
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: ZipSlack 10: can't write to mounted vfat files system

Alan Hicks <alan@lizella.netWORK> wrote in message news:<40eb3df6_2@127.0.0.1>...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Don't you people ever read the FAQ?
> http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/cg...t&_minMatches=
>
> - --
> It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise,
> Than for a man to hear the song of fools.
> Ecclesiastes 7:5
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFA6z7zlKR45I6cfKARAnN6AKCA8VB5pdg34MuR/s2q4C9MMpbkiQCfWgbA
> KLytEOuDTfWTPfUYg/zAd7Y=
> =0pL7
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


The problem turned out to be a corrupted file system. When I used a
knoppix disc to run dosfsck, it found and fixed errors. Then I was
able to write to the FAT32 volume, with the fstab as stated above.
The problem now is that every time I install some new software
(acroread, firefox) I get new file corruptions. Is there something
inherently unstable about UMSDOS?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com