This is a discussion on SLACKWARE 10 within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Mark Hill (mrhill@gmail.com) writes: > On 26 Aug 2004 02:17:20 GMT, > Michael Black <et472@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote: >> >> Didn't ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Mark Hill (mrhill@gmail.com) writes: > On 26 Aug 2004 02:17:20 GMT, > Michael Black <et472@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote: >> >> Didn't it suddenly bump up to 7 from around 4? > > It did. Pat's explanation as to why can be found in the offical FAQ: > <http://www.slackware.com/faq/do_faq.php?faq=general> > I remember the explanation, I just wasn't sure at what particular version the jump was made. Michael |
| |||
| PAUL SUTTON (ZEN14920@ZEN.CO.UK) writes: > Well this is not as bad as jumping from 3.1 / 3.11 to er 95, then to > 98, then to ME then jumping to 2000 / XP. > > > paul > That's what the distributions need. "Slackware 2004". Michael > Mark Hill wrote: > >> On 26 Aug 2004 02:17:20 GMT, >> Michael Black <et472@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote: >> >>>Didn't it suddenly bump up to 7 from around 4? >> >> >> It did. Pat's explanation as to why can be found in the offical FAQ: >> <http://www.slackware.com/faq/do_faq.php?faq=general> >> |
| |||
| Michael Black wrote: > > PAUL SUTTON (ZEN14920@ZEN.CO.UK) writes: >> Well this is not as bad as jumping from 3.1 / 3.11 to er 95, then to >> 98, then to ME then jumping to 2000 / XP. >> >> >> paul >> > That's what the distributions need. "Slackware 2004". > > Michael Mystery Slackware Theater 3000. :-) > >> Mark Hill wrote: >> >>> On 26 Aug 2004 02:17:20 GMT, >>> Michael Black <et472@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote: >>> >>>>Didn't it suddenly bump up to 7 from around 4? >>> >>> >>> It did. Pat's explanation as to why can be found in the offical FAQ: >>> <http://www.slackware.com/faq/do_faq.php?faq=general> >>> |
| |||
| Mark Hill wrote: > On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:37:54 GMT, > Rich Grise <null@example.net> wrote: >> >> Well, congratulations, and welcome back. AFAIK, Mr. Volkerding hasn't >> been in hibernation, so installation is a breeze > > Also, the installer interface hasn't changed much over the years, so the > OP should find it familiar. > The thing about the new installer interface that just leaped out of my computer right into my lap is that USA Pacific Time Zone isn't in alphabetical order any more. Or either that or PV fixed "page down." ;-) Cheers! Rich |
| ||||
| Rich Grise (null@example.net) writes: > Michael Black wrote: > >> >> PAUL SUTTON (ZEN14920@ZEN.CO.UK) writes: >>> Well this is not as bad as jumping from 3.1 / 3.11 to er 95, then to >>> 98, then to ME then jumping to 2000 / XP. >>> >>> >>> paul >>> >> That's what the distributions need. "Slackware 2004". >> >> Michael > > Mystery Slackware Theater 3000. > > :-) > After I posted, I thought of an incident that shows how little I pay attention to Microsoft. A couple of years ago, someone posted a message titlted "WIN ME" in the local buy and sell newsgroup. I opened it, to see what was being offered, and to see how I could win it. Imagine my disappointment when it turns out to be someone selling "Windows Millenium". Michael |