Unix Technical Forum

SLACKWARE 10

This is a discussion on SLACKWARE 10 within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Mark Hill (mrhill@gmail.com) writes: > On 26 Aug 2004 02:17:20 GMT, > Michael Black <et472@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote: >> >> Didn't ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Slackware Linux Support

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 03:02 PM
Michael Black
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SLACKWARE 10


Mark Hill (mrhill@gmail.com) writes:
> On 26 Aug 2004 02:17:20 GMT,
> Michael Black <et472@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote:
>>
>> Didn't it suddenly bump up to 7 from around 4?

>
> It did. Pat's explanation as to why can be found in the offical FAQ:
> <http://www.slackware.com/faq/do_faq.php?faq=general>
>

I remember the explanation, I just wasn't sure at what particular
version the jump was made.

Michael

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 03:02 PM
Michael Black
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SLACKWARE 10


PAUL SUTTON (ZEN14920@ZEN.CO.UK) writes:
> Well this is not as bad as jumping from 3.1 / 3.11 to er 95, then to
> 98, then to ME then jumping to 2000 / XP.
>
>
> paul
>

That's what the distributions need. "Slackware 2004".

Michael

> Mark Hill wrote:
>
>> On 26 Aug 2004 02:17:20 GMT,
>> Michael Black <et472@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote:
>>
>>>Didn't it suddenly bump up to 7 from around 4?

>>
>>
>> It did. Pat's explanation as to why can be found in the offical FAQ:
>> <http://www.slackware.com/faq/do_faq.php?faq=general>
>>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 03:03 PM
Rich Grise
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SLACKWARE 10

Michael Black wrote:

>
> PAUL SUTTON (ZEN14920@ZEN.CO.UK) writes:
>> Well this is not as bad as jumping from 3.1 / 3.11 to er 95, then to
>> 98, then to ME then jumping to 2000 / XP.
>>
>>
>> paul
>>

> That's what the distributions need. "Slackware 2004".
>
> Michael


Mystery Slackware Theater 3000.

:-)

>
>> Mark Hill wrote:
>>
>>> On 26 Aug 2004 02:17:20 GMT,
>>> Michael Black <et472@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Didn't it suddenly bump up to 7 from around 4?
>>>
>>>
>>> It did. Pat's explanation as to why can be found in the offical FAQ:
>>> <http://www.slackware.com/faq/do_faq.php?faq=general>
>>>


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 03:03 PM
Rich Grise
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SLACKWARE 10

Mark Hill wrote:

> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:37:54 GMT,
> Rich Grise <null@example.net> wrote:
>>
>> Well, congratulations, and welcome back. AFAIK, Mr. Volkerding hasn't
>> been in hibernation, so installation is a breeze

>
> Also, the installer interface hasn't changed much over the years, so the
> OP should find it familiar.
>

The thing about the new installer interface that just leaped out of my
computer right into my lap is that USA Pacific Time Zone isn't in
alphabetical order any more. Or either that or PV fixed "page down." ;-)

Cheers!
Rich

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 03:04 PM
Michael Black
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SLACKWARE 10


Rich Grise (null@example.net) writes:
> Michael Black wrote:
>
>>
>> PAUL SUTTON (ZEN14920@ZEN.CO.UK) writes:
>>> Well this is not as bad as jumping from 3.1 / 3.11 to er 95, then to
>>> 98, then to ME then jumping to 2000 / XP.
>>>
>>>
>>> paul
>>>

>> That's what the distributions need. "Slackware 2004".
>>
>> Michael

>
> Mystery Slackware Theater 3000.
>
> :-)
>

After I posted, I thought of an incident that shows how little I pay
attention to Microsoft.

A couple of years ago, someone posted a message titlted "WIN ME"
in the local buy and sell newsgroup. I opened it, to see what was
being offered, and to see how I could win it. Imagine my disappointment
when it turns out to be someone selling "Windows Millenium".

Michael

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com