This is a discussion on Removing Epiphany? within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> yus Mam +Alan Hicks+ wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Trim your posts. Stop ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| yus Mam +Alan Hicks+ wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Trim your posts. Stop top-posting. > -The Management > > - -- > It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise, > Than for a man to hear the song of fools. > Ecclesiastes 7:5 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFBVHYmlKR45I6cfKARArXlAJ9B+C590ym8gDagCYhZyZ d5K1/6xQCeK2hs > yD6MvLXXHn7AMhdtFpvegXY= > =Hxxi > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| |||
| Oh man it's nice fishing here... Two Ravens wrote: > nalsing wrote: > > >>yus Mam >> You get to have >>+Alan Hicks+ wrote: > > > >>>Trim your posts. Stop top-posting. > > > Did you not understand the second sentence, the one that was written, > "Stop top-posting."? sooo.... much fun |
| ||||
| NOTICE: This message may not have been sent by the Sender Name above. Always use cryptographic digital signatures to verify the identity of the sender of any usenet post or e-mail. pgp trash troll delete Hicks, Alan 188 Shady Dale Dr Lizella, GA 31052 478-935-8132 +Alan Hicks+ <alan@lizella.network> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > In alt.os.linux.slackware, NeoSadist dared to utter, >> I'm not sure of Slackare's intended audience at times > > it's kind of odd. I don't think Slackware really has an intended > audience. I've always had the impression that Pat kind of does what he > likes and those people who like the same sort of things in their OS are > going to gravitate to Slackware. > >> I wish somehow I could figure out what >> Slackware's main ideas are, like if he's making a distribution for servers, >> for hobbyists, to be Unix-like, for people with faster computers, for >> people with slower computers, etc. > > Slackware's officially stated goals are (and have always been to my > knowledge) ease of use and stability. > >> They claim to be more Unix-like, which >> is a good goal, and one that I think he's reached, but I'd like him to give >> more input at times, or make the goals more clear. > > I think you will notice that if you start doing things in the Slackware > community, Pat will take notice and listen to you. If you think a > package should be included, you can always send him an e-mail and he > might think about it. If you send him patches or SlackBuild scripts, > he'll almost certainly consider it for some time before making a > decision. > >> He did say easy to use at one time was his goal, but Mandrake and other >> distributions are usually thought of in this category before Slackware. > > Depends on your definition of ease of use. If you mean something that > will configure everything for me and dump me into a completely useable > OS, but one that I might not know how to use well, then you're talking > Mandrake. If you're talking about something that is consistant, > requiring little relearning even between large version jumps, you're > thinking Slackware. Slackware is easier to use in the sense that > nothing is done behind your back so you (should) always know exactly > what is happening at any given time. > > - -- > It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise, > Than for a man to hear the song of fools. > Ecclesiastes 7:5 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFBVJHXlKR45I6cfKARAqnQAJ4wzFNCXfOFtyirfcv/6o3d23MjUQCfUcGA > xbZNbISpgfIaJUnmSnozmcA= > =0DLP > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |