"BenneJezzerette" <jennifer755@cox.net> wrote in message
news:S1e5e.32$63.16@fed1read02...

> glib and gcc, and I think gtk all have intertwined actions. at lest this
> is what I have been led to believe. Clarify please. Then I can be better
> informed.

Depends what you mean by intertwined - everything is dependant on glibc,
those are the system libraries which all binaries rely on in some form or
another. gcc is a compiler suite (though it too has some libraries of its
own), it needs glibc in order to compile programs. While gtk is a set of
libraries/functions used for instance in gnome (amongst others).

I'm not quite sure the point of your reply - are you saying you've had no
problem, or are you asking about another problem?

Martin J. Green wrote:
> "BenneJezzerette" <jennifer755@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:S1e5e.32$63.16@fed1read02...
>
>
>>glib and gcc, and I think gtk all have intertwined actions. at lest this
>>is what I have been led to believe. Clarify please. Then I can be better
>>informed.
>
>
> Depends what you mean by intertwined - everything is dependant on glibc,
> those are the system libraries which all binaries rely on in some form or
> another. gcc is a compiler suite (though it too has some libraries of its
> own), it needs glibc in order to compile programs. While gtk is a set of
> libraries/functions used for instance in gnome (amongst others).
>
> I'm not quite sure the point of your reply - are you saying you've had no
> problem, or are you asking about another problem?
>
>
firstly seems there is no problem, secondly reason I say no problem is
because the files I compile are the ones I use the ./configure or sh
configure and let it profile my system. Like the new Apache 2.x I just
got, I have not done anything with it yet, but that is why I am asking
and mentioning this. Because I do not program as of yet, and want to
learn, and then the programs I do have to setup, like apache or the alsa
1.0.9rc2 or a few other things like the GTK+ 2X. They have not given me
issue.

The one that has is the Linux 2.6.11.6 setting and conpiling, Something
somewhere is not working yet I have a full profile of my system and
knows just what I need, yet somewhere I think that the old gcc or gllibc
files were not up to date and crashed it. this is my only real issue.

"BenneJezzerette" <jennifer755@cox.net> wrote in message
news:W5l5e.70$63.28@fed1read02...

> firstly seems there is no problem, secondly reason I say no problem is
> because the files I compile are the ones I use the ./configure or sh
> configure and let it profile my system. Like the new Apache 2.x I just
> got, I have not done anything with it yet, but that is why I am asking and
> mentioning this. Because I do not program as of yet, and want to learn,
> and then the programs I do have to setup, like apache or the alsa 1.0.9rc2
> or a few other things like the GTK+ 2X. They have not given me issue.
>
> The one that has is the Linux 2.6.11.6 setting and conpiling, Something
> somewhere is not working yet I have a full profile of my system and knows
> just what I need, yet somewhere I think that the old gcc or gllibc files
> were not up to date and crashed it. this is my only real issue.

Sorry, I was asking for anyone who had experienced the same problem, or had
an idea exactly what was causing it, not for a profile of people's systems
who were not experiencing any problems at all, nor even running the same
program/daemon.

Martin J. Green wrote:
> "BenneJezzerette" <jennifer755@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:W5l5e.70$63.28@fed1read02...
>
>
>>firstly seems there is no problem, secondly reason I say no problem is
>>because the files I compile are the ones I use the ./configure or sh
>>configure and let it profile my system. Like the new Apache 2.x I just
>>got, I have not done anything with it yet, but that is why I am asking and
>>mentioning this. Because I do not program as of yet, and want to learn,
>>and then the programs I do have to setup, like apache or the alsa 1.0.9rc2
>>or a few other things like the GTK+ 2X. They have not given me issue.
>>
>>The one that has is the Linux 2.6.11.6 setting and conpiling, Something
>>somewhere is not working yet I have a full profile of my system and knows
>>just what I need, yet somewhere I think that the old gcc or gllibc files
>>were not up to date and crashed it. this is my only real issue.
>
>
> Sorry, I was asking for anyone who had experienced the same problem, or had
> an idea exactly what was causing it, not for a profile of people's systems
> who were not experiencing any problems at all, nor even running the same
> program/daemon.
>
>
Ok, well I did the slapt-get update to the -current and am all up to
date with all the libraries and everything. My only errors now are KDE
and some gclibs on shut down