-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

This is a message to that one person who is a PGP hater. Get some
education please. Your pgp troll delete is old and out dated. Be more
creative, use less foul language try to come off with some intellect. Be
spontaneous and up to date, the reasons for PGP is to show, the e-mail
sent is from the actual person sending it. Take a pill and calm down,
maybe with some good conversation, and less foul mouthed unrelated
information that has nothing to do with Slackware, it's futures, and
what you use it for, or would like to see implemented in it.


I downloaded the Latest iso's and a nice thing in my linux bible, use
mount -o loop filename.iso here, where here is a directory where the iso
is decompressed, then just use the upgradepkg *.tgz and anything that is
new will be upgraded, and anything that is not already installed will
say not installed, then use installpkg filename.tgz and there you go,
updated and all ready to say -current.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCk8WapVvE1td8WYoRAoViAJ9BuieXZ08JA+D53cxGw8 pqMqjpCgCfbQ6n
CrFO3IzMTvjFbWv45OHekPY=
=WSUi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On 2005-05-25, BenneJezzerette <jennifer755@cox.net> wrote:
>
> This is a message to that one person who is a PGP hater. Get some
> education please. Your pgp troll delete is old and out dated. Be more
> creative, use less foul language try to come off with some intellect. Be
> spontaneous and up to date, the reasons for PGP is to show, the e-mail
> sent is from the actual person sending it. Take a pill and calm down,
> maybe with some good conversation, and less foul mouthed unrelated
> information that has nothing to do with Slackware, it's futures, and
> what you use it for, or would like to see implemented in it.
>

Well, hell. That'll teach 'em.

ken

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

No_One wrote:
> On 2005-05-25, BenneJezzerette <jennifer755@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>This is a message to that one person who is a PGP hater. Get some
>>education please. Your pgp troll delete is old and out dated. Be more
>>creative, use less foul language try to come off with some intellect. Be
>>spontaneous and up to date, the reasons for PGP is to show, the e-mail
>>sent is from the actual person sending it. Take a pill and calm down,
>>maybe with some good conversation, and less foul mouthed unrelated
>>information that has nothing to do with Slackware, it's futures, and
>>what you use it for, or would like to see implemented in it.
>>
>
>
> Well, hell. That'll teach 'em.
>
> ken
maybe.only time will tell, either that intellectually challenged PGP
Troll Delete or FO will be posted, then we know that this persons
vocabulary is so limited, that they probably have someone else type it
in for them.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCk+GppVvE1td8WYoRAg0rAKCNxkiej7czvbKnjXFmCB V/BvmS9QCfQDBt
/Yv4FlShfJWw2HnJ+nQBMEM=
=W7WX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On Tue, 24 May 2005 17:23:54 -0700, BenneJezzerette wrote:

> ... the reasons for PGP is to show, the e-mail sent is from the actual
> person sending it.

This isn't email. This is Usenet.

--
If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
Linux Registered User #327951

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dan C wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2005 17:23:54 -0700, BenneJezzerette wrote:
>
>
>>... the reasons for PGP is to show, the e-mail sent is from the actual
>>person sending it.
>
>
> This isn't email. This is Usenet.
>
No! Really!!!??? and to think, (sarcasm abounds) if you didn't say it, I
would never have known!! Not!!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFClAcppVvE1td8WYoRAgU7AJ4ub6ezWLis1nSi7g1uHH RuHUW9rwCdHJpe
czMMZYhOxIHGlf3nN3DM63I=
=aCAk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On Tue, 24 May 2005 22:03:37 -0700, BenneJezzerette wrote:

>>>... the reasons for PGP is to show, the e-mail sent is from the actual
>>>person sending it.

>> This isn't email. This is Usenet.

> No! Really!!!??? and to think, (sarcasm abounds) if you didn't say it, I
> would never have known!! Not!!

So why do you explain the use of PGP on Usenet by saying what you said
above? You said "the email is sent...". Email is different than these
posts on Usenet, genius. Do you even know why you think you need to use
PGP on Usenet?

--
If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
Linux Registered User #327951

BenneJezzerette <jennifer755@cox.net> writes:

> This is a message to that one person who is a PGP hater. Get some
> education please. Your pgp troll delete is old and out dated.

Happy Saint Mary Magdalene de' Pazzi day!


It sure is old - he has been doing this for years, now I think. Even after
using pgp himself for a spell - rm has a fine sense of irony. Arguing
with rm, trying to appeal to his better nature, trying to embarrass him
just does not work. Some here started using pgp just to make sure that
rm did not hi-jack their identity.

The _only_ way to choke this man off, or at least reduce background noise,
is to ignore him :-)

If you get bored one evening, do a google search on a.o.l.s on

"Realto Margarino"

cordially as always

pgp troll delete


He shows a truly awesome dedication to annoying others :-)

atb


Glyn
--
RTFM http://www.tldp.org/index.html
GAFC http://slackbook.org/ The Official Source :-)
STFW http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...inux.slackware
JFGI http://jfgi.us/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dan C <youmustbejoking@invalid.lan> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2005 22:03:37 -0700, BenneJezzerette wrote:
>
>>>>... the reasons for PGP is to show, the e-mail sent is from the actual
>>>>person sending it.
>
>>> This isn't email. This is Usenet.
>
>> No! Really!!!??? and to think, (sarcasm abounds) if you didn't say it, I
>> would never have known!! Not!!
>
> So why do you explain the use of PGP on Usenet by saying what you said
> above? You said "the email is sent...". Email is different than these
> posts on Usenet, genius. Do you even know why you think you need to use
> PGP on Usenet?
>

See the reason why this thread was even started. If you didn't
know that the real Alan Hicks didn't use PGP for his messages, how
would you be able to tell his posts from rm? How would you be able to
tell who was who? With PGP, regardless of where it is posted, emailed,
transferred, or otherwise, I could go to a keyserver, find Alan's
public key, and check the signature of his message against his key. If
they match, I know that it was really Alan Hicks who wrote the message.
That sort of thing is hard to fake (unless you have 10^6 years to try
to get one key hacked right for one message).

PGP isn't only used for email anymore.

BL.
- --
Brad Littlejohn | Email: tyketto@sbcglobal.net
Unix Systems Administrator, | tyketto@ozemail.com.au
Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! | http://www.sbcglobal.net/~tyketto
PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFClKY9yBkZmuMZ8L8RAv3xAKDcaZgjwbChK4hnThGWE3 povcBFSACg8Ew5
nw4f+xrwroy8hXKCZHImios=
=Krl2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

A Guy Called Tyketto <tyketto@sbcglobal.net.invalid> trolled:

> See the reason why this thread was even started. If you didn't
> know that the real Alan Hicks didn't use PGP for his messages, how
> would you be able to tell his posts from rm? How would you be able to
> tell who was who? With PGP, regardless of where it is posted, emailed,
> transferred, or otherwise, I could go to a keyserver, find Alan's
> public key, and check the signature of his message against his key. If
> they match, I know that it was really Alan Hicks who wrote the message.

But just because a message does not have a pgp signature does not
mean that the message is not genuine. You have the logical
abilities of a three-year old if you think that the absence of pgp
proves that a particular posting is not genuine.

BTW: your posting contains pgp trash as well.

pgp use on usenet is nothing more nor less than a pretentious, and
very anal, affectation. pgp serves no useful purpose in usenet and
since it produces a signature longer than the usenet standard of 4
lines, the use of pgp in usenet violates accepted norms of
netiquette.

cordially, even to pgp trash trolls,

rm
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 120,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

+Realto+ wrote:

> BTW: your posting contains pgp trash as well.

Arguably so does every one of your (seemingly) endless stream of "trash
troll delete" messages.

> pgp use on usenet is nothing more nor less than a pretentious, and
> very anal, affectation.

Arguably so is every one of your (seemingly) endless stream of "trash
troll delete" messages.

> pgp serves no useful purpose in usenet ...

Some would disagree with this statement. Others, I admit, would
defend it. I would say that this is an un-settled issue. The "useful
purpose" is there for a PGP-signed message regardless of the medium,
but whether Netnews (alt.* is not "Usenet" proper) is an appropriate
medium for PGP-signed messages is certainly a matter worthy of debate.
I don't believe it's so simply cut-and-dried, though.

> since it produces a signature longer than the usenet standard of 4
> lines, the use of pgp in usenet violates accepted norms of
> netiquette.

These would be the same "accepted norms of netiquette" that propose the
use of sig-dashes to clearly delineate the signature from the body of the
message, would they not? If you're so concerned about adherence to the
"accepted norms of netiquette", where are your sig-dashes?

--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sylvain Robitaille syl@alcor.concordia.ca

Systems analyst Concordia University
Instructional & Information Technology Montreal, Quebec, Canada
----------------------------------------------------------------------