This is a discussion on Small display issue with recent kernel within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Hi, Currently testing 2.6.11.10's desktop capabilities. One small issue so far. When I open Konsole (KDE) and perform some ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hi, Currently testing 2.6.11.10's desktop capabilities. One small issue so far. When I open Konsole (KDE) and perform some operation that has a lot of screen output (tar xvzf OpenOffice_xxxx.tar.gz or the likes), I get small dotted lines here and there on the screen. I wonder if this is an issue with my (latest) Nvidia driver. Anyway: don't have this problem with stock 2.4.29. Any clues? Niki Kovacs -- I'm not as think as you stoned I am. |
| |||
| Niki Kovacs <mickey@mouse.com> wrote: >Hi, > >Currently testing 2.6.11.10's desktop capabilities. One small issue so far. >When I open Konsole (KDE) and perform some operation that has a lot of >screen output (tar xvzf OpenOffice_xxxx.tar.gz or the likes), I get small >dotted lines here and there on the screen. I wonder if this is an issue >with my (latest) Nvidia driver. Anyway: don't have this problem with stock >2.4.29. > >Any clues? Check to see if the dots are remains of "decenders" on characters. That would be the bottom dots from g, y, p, j, and q. You can probably test that by simply typing in a series 'g' characters on the command line, and then backspacing to clear them. If that leaves a line of dots... I don't know precisely what the problem is, but it is with X, not the kernel, your video driver, or whatever. It has something to do with the way fonts are generated. I've had loads of problems trying to find a nice font to work on a 1024x768 screen without seeing those dots. Other resolutions are not as much of a problem, but the effect can certainly be demonstrated. The solution is to use different font parameters. -- Floyd L. Davidson <http://web.newsguy.com/floyd_davidson> Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd@barrow.com |
| |||
| On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 08:52:38 -0800, floyd@barrow.com (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote: > >It has something to do with the way fonts are generated. I've >had loads of problems trying to find a nice font to work on a >1024x768 screen without seeing those dots. Solution space: 1) test: works in 800x600, goes strange in 1024x768 --> 2) install 100 dpi fonts. (o:< --Grant. |
| |||
| Grant Coady <grant_lkml@dodo.com.au> wrote: >On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 08:52:38 -0800, floyd@barrow.com (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote: >> >>It has something to do with the way fonts are generated. I've >>had loads of problems trying to find a nice font to work on a >>1024x768 screen without seeing those dots. > >Solution space: 1) test: works in 800x600, goes strange in >1024x768 --> 2) install 100 dpi fonts. (o:< That's exactly the kind of "change in parameters" that has to be done. It depends on exactly which font you use though, as to whether that specific change will do anything or not. I can certainly find ways to get the exact same effect with 100 dpi fonts! My particular problem is that I like 100x30 xterm and editing screens, fonts which provide a nice form factor for that, *and* (the list goes on...) are san serif with easy to recognize ';' and ':' or ',' and '.' characters. It happens that the -misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed fonts are just about perfect. Except finding size width and height parameters that work well with a 1024x768 resolutions is impossible. Since the only place I use that resolution is on a laptop, a few compromises are ok. So if I remember right, my screens don't end up 100x30 on the laptop. -- Floyd L. Davidson <http://web.newsguy.com/floyd_davidson> Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd@barrow.com |
| |||
| On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 13:36:05 -0800, floyd@barrow.com (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote: >> >>Solution space: 1) test: works in 800x600, goes strange in >>1024x768 --> 2) install 100 dpi fonts. (o:< > >That's exactly the kind of "change in parameters" that has to be >done. It depends on exactly which font you use though, as to >whether that specific change will do anything or not. I can >certainly find ways to get the exact same effect with 100 dpi >fonts! Truetype or the older 'Speedo? I forgot the 'rules', odd or even pixel height, regenerating the font control files, was 4 years ago it mattered with PuTTY. 100 dpi easy answer for some, though I remember taking ages to pick a good font-set for monospace NEdit use. I get 100 x 37 on 800 x 600 laptop CLI vesafb 8 x 16 VGA charset --Grant. |
| ||||
| Grant Coady wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 13:36:05 -0800, floyd@barrow.com (Floyd L. Davidson) > wrote: >>> >>>Solution space: 1) test: works in 800x600, goes strange in >>>1024x768 --> 2) install 100 dpi fonts. (o:< I found the solution, way off. Forgot to configure nvidia chipset in my kernel config Included AGP and nvidia chipset directly into the kernel. Works like a charm now. cheers, Niki -- I'm not as think as you stoned I am. |