Unix Technical Forum

Packages, compilation, build scripts, checkinstall... few questions

This is a discussion on Packages, compilation, build scripts, checkinstall... few questions within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Eef Hartman wrote: > In German VIC sounds too much like "fick" (fuck in English)..... Vic 20! at the ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Slackware Linux Support

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #101 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2008, 01:15 PM
Niki Kovacs
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Packages, compilation, build scripts, checkinstall... few questions

Eef Hartman wrote:

> In German VIC sounds too much like "fick" (fuck in English).....


Vic 20! at the time, I was sixteen years old, and boy, would I have liked to
take that exhortation literally....... but then, I just bought the PC
instead.

D

Niki

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #102 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2008, 01:15 PM
Thomas Overgaard
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Packages, compilation, build scripts, checkinstall... few questions

Niki Kovacs wrote:

> The first project name was initially PINE... until the french
> translation office reported a serious... er... ambiguity.


The word "pine" exist in Danish too. Used as noun its "pain" and used as
verb its "torture".

So the ad wouldn't be much better here, maybe even worse.
--
Thomas O.

This area is designed to become quite warm during normal operation.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #103 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2008, 01:16 PM
steelneck
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Packages, compilation, build scripts, checkinstall... few questions

Niki Kovacs wrote:
> steelneck wrote:
>
>
>>I also hunt around for working supermount patches and patch
>>the kernel with them, i like to just be able to put in
>>a mem-stick, flash-card, CD or whatever, and it is there
>>at the mountpoint, no mount/umonting hassle.. not to
>>mention my wife.

>
>
> I'm looking for something similar. Usually I write some udev entries for all
> my devices, so for example CUPS knows that /dev/laserprinter is my Brother
> printer and /dev/inkjetprinter is my HP PSC 1210... or he doesn't take my
> USB stick for my camera, so I have /dev/stick and /dev/camera.
>


I have more and more ben tinkering with the
idea of using supermount for the mounting part,
and have something else to update fstab and
crate mountpoints based on the "gizmos" volume
label or maybe the what type of "gizmo" it is.
But i cant even find the time for other things...

The nice thing with supermount is that it is
very easy to configure, just a line in fstab,
and that it is a pseudo filesystem and does not
need any umounting, just plugin/out the gizmo in
question. The problem is just that it uses static
mountpoints and that it is not very well maintained
and needs a kernel compilation with new versions
for every new kernel version. Had been much simpler
if it allredy was in a vanilla kernel.



--
Software is not manufactured, it is something you write and publish.
Keep Europe free from software patents, we do not want censorship
by patent law on written works.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #104 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2008, 01:16 PM
Niki Kovacs
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Packages, compilation, build scripts, checkinstall... few questions

steelneck wrote:

> The nice thing with supermount is that it is
> very easy to configure, just a line in fstab,
> and that it is a pseudo filesystem and does not
> need any umounting, just plugin/out the gizmo in
> question. The problem is just that it uses static
> mountpoints and that it is not very well maintained
> and needs a kernel compilation with new versions
> for every new kernel version. Had been much simpler
> if it allredy was in a vanilla kernel.


This at least shouldn't be a problem, since first thing I install after a
fresh Slackware install is a recent kernel tuned to hardware.

I'll check this out as soon as I have some time.

Cheers,

Niki
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #105 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2008, 02:10 PM
Chick Tower
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: PySol (was Packages, compilation, build scripts, checkinstall... few questions)

On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 23:46:48 +0100, Thomas Overgaard wrote:
> Or search this group at group google for PySol and how to install it.
> Pysol comes with something like 200 different solitaire card games.


Have you got PySol running, Thomas? I got the latest (final) version to
run on Slackware 9.1, but not 10.1, because it doesn't run with the
version of python that 10.1 installs. Not being python-proficient yet, I
didn't delve into what was available of the code to see if I could fix it.

--
Chick Tower
================================================
For e-mail: aols . sent . towerboy AT xoxy . net


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #106 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2008, 02:10 PM
Franklin
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: PySol (was Packages, compilation, build scripts, checkinstall... few questions)

On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:59:56 -0500, Chick Tower wrote:

> On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 23:46:48 +0100, Thomas Overgaard wrote:
>> Or search this group at group google for PySol and how to install it.
>> Pysol comes with something like 200 different solitaire card games.

>
> Have you got PySol running, Thomas? I got the latest (final) version to
> run on Slackware 9.1, but not 10.1, because it doesn't run with the
> version of python that 10.1 installs. Not being python-proficient yet, I
> didn't delve into what was available of the code to see if I could fix it.


I have PySol running on Slackware 10.2 with Freerock Gnome installed.

The PySol Package was from here:

http://www.spykes.net/packages/pysol-4.82-i486-1spi.tgz

(mentioned in another thread)

There was a dependency on smpeg which I got from here:

http://www.linuxpackages.net/pkg_details.php?id=7638

There was a package of smpeg for 10.1 as well. The 10.2 package was built
on an install with the freerock libs. I don't know about how the 10.1
package was built. I'm running python version 2.4.1

HTH
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com