sata hda?
This is a discussion on sata hda? within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Is a SATA disk still hda? I have a system that works with Windows 2000 and MS-DOS 6.22 but ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
02-20-2008, 01:54 PM
| |||
| |||
 Re: sata hda? On 07 Jan 2006 05:35:17 GMT, Falsto Butterino <rm.can@bite.me.org> wrote: >Is a SATA disk still hda? I have a system that works with Windows >2000 and MS-DOS 6.22 but slackware 10.2 fdisk doesn't see it. /dev/sda, unless your BIOS masquerades the thing as PATA, stuff happens Grant.      |
|
02-20-2008, 01:54 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: sata hda? Falsto Butterino (ROFLOL!!!!!) wrote: > > > > Is a SATA disk still hda? I have a system that works with Windows > 2000 and MS-DOS 6.22 but slackware 10.2 fdisk doesn't see it. Check your boot kernel options. IIRC, F1 on boot, and then look for a kernel for that. Love your nick! Niki Kovacs -- I'm not as think as you stoned I am. |
|
02-20-2008, 01:54 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: sata hda? Falsto Butterino wrote: > > > > Is a SATA disk still hda? I have a system that works with Windows > 2000 and MS-DOS 6.22 but slackware 10.2 fdisk doesn't see it. It will be registered as /dev/sda but you have to boot from the sata.i kernel during installation so that it can be seen. If you boot from bare.i, you will not be able to see the drive and prep it for installation. Gecko |
Linear Mode
