This is a discussion on External HD (usb ?) within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Hello all, I'm rapidly running out of disk space on my Slackware 10.2 system, and am considering purchasing an ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hello all, I'm rapidly running out of disk space on my Slackware 10.2 system, and am considering purchasing an external HD. I'd like to go for something in the 120GB range. I'm assuming that it will connect to my computer via USB. My computer is only a couple of years old at most, if memory serves me correctly. My question is; can I safely assume that I'll be able to get this new HD connected to my Slackware 10.2 system via USB without too much hassle ? If so, what would be a good brand to buy ? (Ok, that's two questions.) I'll buy anything from Western Digital but it would be nice to know what some other folks on here are using with their slack setups. Thanks for your time. NoSleep. |
| |||
| Hi, Im new to Slackware and GNU/Linux only used it for soon a year, but my earlier experience is that any USB-harddrive will work. If you compile your kernel with support for USB2 and USB-Masstorage (Uncertain what the real names really are, shouldnt be to hard to find, and maybe someone else can help you with that otherwise) I have always used Seagate when it comes to HDs. They are quiet and none of my Segate disks has ever broken. If you dont count my second hand bought one, but Seagate replaced it for me, even after the Warranty time was over, and I wasnt the first owner. |
| |||
| I have two; one is USB Powered, the other requires a separate power supply. The first is a WDC Pasport 60GB and it was bought to use with a notebook. The second is an ADS(crappy) enclosure with a 160GB Hitachi. Don't go cheap on the enclosure. John |
| |||
| On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, NoSleep wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm rapidly running out of disk space on my Slackware 10.2 system, and am > considering purchasing an external HD. I'd like to go for something in the > 120GB range. I'm assuming that it will connect to my computer via USB. My > computer is only a couple of years old at most, if memory serves me > correctly. > > My question is; can I safely assume that I'll be able to get this new HD > connected to my Slackware 10.2 system via USB without too much hassle ? > just buy USB<->IDE controller and internal 3.5' 120Gb or more harddrive and default slackware bare.i kernel include usb-storage driver and it must work with any usb mass storage device as SCSI drive (/dev/sda) rusty_dm |
| |||
| On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 20:56:22 +0000, NoSleep wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm rapidly running out of disk space on my Slackware 10.2 system, and am > considering purchasing an external HD. I'd like to go for something in the > 120GB range. I'm assuming that it will connect to my computer via USB. My > computer is only a couple of years old at most, if memory serves me > correctly. > > My question is; can I safely assume that I'll be able to get this new HD > connected to my Slackware 10.2 system via USB without too much hassle ? > > If so, what would be a good brand to buy ? (Ok, that's two questions.) > I'll buy anything from Western Digital but it would be nice to know what > some other folks on here are using with their slack setups. > > Thanks for your time. > > NoSleep. Why not buy an icybox with usb 2.0 and optionally firewire ports: that way u can have any internal hd act like an external hd. It's really handy. And it doesn't restrain you to one connector eg external usb2(1) will always be usb 2(1). here is a link http://www.icybox.de/ |
| |||
| She may well have wrote murder, but on Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:46:09 -0800, granden@gmail.com wrote : > Hi, > Im new to Slackware and GNU/Linux only used it for soon a year, but my > earlier experience is that any USB-harddrive will work. If you compile > your kernel with support for USB2 and USB-Masstorage (Uncertain what the > real names really are, shouldnt be to hard to find, and maybe someone > else can help you with that otherwise) First off, thanks to all the posters who replied to my original post. Much appreciated. I am completely clueless about kernel configuration, I have always gone with the default kernel (that's the one that's used to install Slackware in the first place from a CDROM isn't it ? 2.4 bare.i ?) and it has done all I require of it. The only option I put in during the install process is 'hdd=ide-scsi' for my DVD writer. But now that I know about the USB2 and USB-Masstorage options, I think I will be ok for rebuilding a kernel. I'll give it a shot at least. I have saved these posts so I can refer back to them when I purchase my hard drive soon. Thanks again for your time. NoSleep. |
| |||
| She may well have wrote murder, but on Fri, 27 Jan 2006 01:35:56 +0300, rusty_dm wrote : > On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, NoSleep wrote: > >> can I safely assume that I'll be able to get this new HD >> connected to my Slackware 10.2 system via USB without too much hassle ? >> > > just buy USB<->IDE controller and internal 3.5' 120Gb or more harddrive > and default slackware bare.i kernel include usb-storage driver and it must > work with any usb mass storage device as SCSI drive (/dev/sda) > Just re-read your post after sending my 'thankyou' reply. Thanks for the very precise info. Looks like I'll have a load more storage capacity sooner than I anticipated. NoSleep. |
| |||
| i've also found that using XFS seems to be faster on my (bus powered) USB drive. Formatting the drive XFS means you won't be able to use it on a windows machine of course, but i don't have any windows machines, so it doesn't bother me :-) |
| ||||
| On 27 Jan 2006 06:28:19 -0800, "dez" <dfjaimes@gmail.com> wrote: >i've also found that using XFS seems to be faster on my (bus powered) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ you have a pointer to measurements? 'seems' is so vague. Grant. -- A: Maybe because some people are too annoyed by top-posting. Q: Why do I not get an answer to my question(s)? A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? |