Unix Technical Forum

Why I Like 'removepkg'

This is a discussion on Why I Like 'removepkg' within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> I installed Kubuntu Dapper Drake on a laptop due to KDD's theoretically better out-of-the-box support for hibernation and such.[1] ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Slackware Linux Support

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2008, 06:28 PM
Forrest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why I Like 'removepkg'

I installed Kubuntu Dapper Drake on a laptop due to KDD's theoretically
better out-of-the-box support for hibernation and such.[1] Since the
laptop's sound is dead due to a faulty volume control knob I decided to
free up some memory and disk space by calling up 'adept' and removing
alsa and arts.

adept dutifully removed alsa, arts...and *everything that had the
slightest dependency on either*, including KDE and, yes, itself.

I rebooted and finished what adept had started by wiping KDD from my HD.

Now where did I put those Slackware install disks?

______________________
1. If you wondered, 'theoretically better' means that where Slackware
does nothing vis-a-vis this sort of power management, Kubuntu does
everything -- except, occasionally, the bit about remembering to turn
the screen back on so that you can, for example, do things.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2008, 06:28 PM
Loki Harfagr
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why I Like 'removepkg'

Le Thu, 27 Jul 2006 20:31:14 +0000, Forrest a écrit*:

> I installed Kubuntu Dapper Drake on a laptop due to KDD's theoretically
> better out-of-the-box support for hibernation and such.[1] Since the
> laptop's sound is dead due to a faulty volume control knob I decided to
> free up some memory and disk space by calling up 'adept' and removing
> alsa and arts.
>
> adept dutifully removed alsa, arts...and *everything that had the
> slightest dependency on either*, including KDE and, yes, itself.
>
> I rebooted and finished what adept had started by wiping KDD from my HD.
>
> Now where did I put those Slackware install disks?
>
> ______________________
> 1. If you wondered, 'theoretically better' means that where Slackware
> does nothing vis-a-vis this sort of power management, Kubuntu does
> everything -- except, occasionally, the bit about remembering to turn
> the screen back on so that you can, for example, do things.



Be happy, you didn't even fail into the usual 'dependency hell',
you're now face to face with a clean disk and a trained mind, so
I believe you'll find out within a pinch of ohnoseconds where
*some* of your Slackware install disks are :-)

Anyway, you'd also be fine trying just a boot on any distro/liveCD
you have at hand that allows network and fdisk, then DL the Slackware
basics on a small free partition and install/boot then resume the
install (start with a 2.4.32 basis, the 2.6* are very shaky those last
500 days (and it's not Slackware related) (though I'll admit the
patch/week ratio slowed down a lot and the boot/nohand ratio increased
impressively since Xma//.

/here commershils (sorry Frank +-)
Slackware and balls
Send the ANCes out for ribs
Send the roadies out for more
Chew'em up
\here commershils (sorry Alex, anyway we know Tomorrow belongs to Slack ;o)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com