This is a discussion on Xfce-4.4.0 Packages for testing within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Robby Workman wrote: > On 2007-01-30, Joost Kremers <joostkremers@yahoo.com> wrote: >> at work, where i have an intel box, ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Robby Workman wrote: > On 2007-01-30, Joost Kremers <joostkremers@yahoo.com> wrote: >> at work, where i have an intel box, i'm running slackware 11.0 with xfce as >> well. i used to have xfce4.4rc2, without dbus, and Terminal was ok there, >> because i shut the machine down every day. now with your packages installed >> (not compiled from source), i.e. with dbus, i find Terminal is slow even >> upon first startup. do you know if that could be the result of dbus? (the >> computer is an older PIV 1.7MHz with (only) 256MB RAM (iirc).) > > > Does this bug look relevant? http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2792 mmm... i doubt it. this talks about resizing or moving the Terminal window, but what i mean is that Terminal becomes slow in displaying characters. it's especially obvious with screen: i usually have four instances of mutt running in a screen session in Terminal (or mrxvt ;-) and switching from one to the other (with C-a C-a) is usually instantaneous, but with time, it gets slower and slower in Terminal, until you can almost see the characters being printed one by one... > If not, I don't know what to tell you - I haven't done a comparison with > and without dbus. If that bug doesn't fit your situation, then I will most > certainly do a comparison and find out... i've just started Terminal again, and will keep it running for a few days to see what happens. i'll also check again tomorrow at work, to see if i had composite on or off (don't remember, i did play with it today.) -- Joost Kremers joostkremers@yahoo.com Selbst in die Unterwelt dringt durch Spalten Licht EN:SiS(9) |