Unix Technical Forum

updatedb eats up 98percent

This is a discussion on updatedb eats up 98percent within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> serge_moscou wrote: > well ...ok I won't top-post:-) What is top-posting ?excuse me... Top posting is writing your part ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Slackware Linux Support

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2008, 09:21 PM
Two Ravens
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: updatedb eats up 98percent

serge_moscou wrote:

> well ...ok I won't top-post:-) What is top-posting ?excuse me...


Top posting is writing your part of the post over the part of the previous
post you are quoting.

The post that this is an answer to is an example, you wrote your answer to
Keith Keller, above his reply to you,

See: http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html
--
Two Ravens
"...hit the squirrel..."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2008, 09:21 PM
CBFalconer
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: updatedb eats up 98percent

serge_moscou wrote:
>
> well ...ok I won't top-post:-) What is top-posting ?excuse me...


Your answer belongs after, or intermixed with, the material you
quote, after snipping anything irrelevant to your answer. See the
following links:

--
Some informative links:
<http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html>
<http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html>
<http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html>
<http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/> (taming google)
<http://members.fortunecity.com/nnqweb/> (newusers)



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2008, 09:21 PM
serge_moscou
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: updatedb eats up 98percent (the problem is solved)

Hi everybody
and thank you very much

updatedb command ran eternally because there was a windows (remote !!!)
partition mounted
in the system. Even when the remote windows machine was down its vfat
partion remained mounted.



"serge_moscou" <serge_mtu@mtu-net.ru> сообщил/сообщила в новостях следующее:
news:etg0u3$12nu$1@news.mtu.ru...
> hello
>
> today I found the remote system extremely slow.
> I looked up top
> and saw this:
>
> pid user pr ni virt res shr s %CPU
> %mem TIME+ command
>
> 659 root 20 0 20012 10m 476 R 98.2 23.5
> 201:59:93 updatedb
>
>
> I killed but it seems strange
>
> thank you
>



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2008, 09:23 PM
Dave Dickman
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: updatedb eats up 98percent (the problem is solved)

serge_moscou wrote:

> updatedb command ran eternally because there was a windows (remote !!!)
> partition mounted
> in the system. Even when the remote windows machine was down its vfat
> partion remained mounted.
>


"man updatedb" notes:
"Options currently supported by Secure Locate are PRUNEFS and PRUNEPATHS"



--
Linux User #152843
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com