This is a discussion on PPTP Passthrough on Slackware Router/Firewall w/ NAT within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> I'm trying to connect to my workplace's network using VPN (PPTP, specifically). It has been setup, and it works ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| I'm trying to connect to my workplace's network using VPN (PPTP, specifically). It has been setup, and it works (the other tech who works with us verified that). I, however, am unable to connect from my house. I've determined that the reason is that he was using a direct connection to the internet, where as I'm am trying to connect through my firewall/router at my house, which happens to be a Slackware 11 box using IP Masq & iptables. I connect to the internet via dialup, not that that should matter too much. I've googled around the internet a few times, and discovered that what I need is for my router to enable PPTP Passthrough, but I couldn't find a good reference on how to do that on Slackware/manually. Does anyone here know of a good way to do this? The machine I'm trying to connect with from home is a Windows XP box (I plan on putting Slackware on a partition beside it & dual booting). Any help with this problem would be greatly appreciated. |
| |||
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2007-03-30, mleo2003 <mleo2003@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm trying to connect to my workplace's network using VPN (PPTP, > specifically). It has been setup, and it works (the other tech who > works with us verified that). I, however, am unable to connect from my > house. I've determined that the reason is that he was using a direct > connection to the internet, where as I'm am trying to connect through > my firewall/router at my house, which happens to be a Slackware 11 box > using IP Masq & iptables. I connect to the internet via dialup, not > that that should matter too much. Verify that by connecting your client workstation directly to the Internet and then attempting to make the connection. > I've googled around the internet a few times, and discovered that what > I need is for my router to enable PPTP Passthrough, but I couldn't > find a good reference on how to do that on Slackware/manually. I'm amazed at the number of people who think they know everything about TCP/IP because they've setup a couple of NAT routers for simple LANs. I have _never_ heard of anyone refer to this as "PPTP Passthrough". That sounds to me like some term a proprietary firewall vendor has dubbed a fix to their firewall because it doesn't by default know anything about GRE. I'm willing to bet that your problem is because your firewall doesn't pass GRE (protocol 47) packets. Google for iptables and GRE/pptp and you should find all the information you need. - -- It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise, Than for a man to hear the song of fools. Ecclesiastes 7:5 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGDbYYFRvIvfSNceoRArjSAKChdNaXLJiux0I6zIxm/0KZBEZX3ACgr6LC TGjAYS+hNRuGnWtK+BvDqok= =iuvg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| |||
| On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:11:40 -0700, mleo2003 wrote: > I'm trying to connect to my workplace's network using VPN (PPTP, > specifically). It has been setup, and it works (the other tech who > works with us verified that). I, however, am unable to connect from my > house. I've determined that the reason is that he was using a direct > connection to the internet, where as I'm am trying to connect through > my firewall/router at my house, which happens to be a Slackware 11 box > using IP Masq & iptables. I connect to the internet via dialup, not > that that should matter too much. > > I've googled around the internet a few times, and discovered that what > I need is for my router to enable PPTP Passthrough, but I couldn't > find a good reference on how to do that on Slackware/manually. Does > anyone here know of a good way to do this? The machine I'm trying to > connect with from home is a Windows XP box (I plan on putting > Slackware on a partition beside it & dual booting). > > Any help with this problem would be greatly appreciated. > Caveat: I am not running PPTP. This project covers PPTP using Linux kernels >= 2.6.15. http://pptpclient.sourceforge.net/ Background http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point-t...eling_protocol Some of the final tweaking to get this working may depend on how you connect. Do you connect via dialup to an ISP, or are you calling your office directly? Your Firewall <-> ISP <-> INTERNET <-> Office PPTP at static IP |
| |||
| On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 07:51:40 -0700, mleo2003 wrote: > I'm dialing to the internet, and then connecting to the Static IP of > the office, just like your "diagram" shows. I haven't had time to play > with it this weekend, but I'll work on it tonight some. Time to play with "WHAT"? Ever heard of quoting some of the text you're replying to, dimwit? > User-Agent: G2/1.0 > X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1 Oh. Well, that explains it. -- "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". |
| |||
| mleo2003 wrote: > > I'm dialing to the internet, and then connecting to the Static IP > of the office, just like your "diagram" shows. I haven't had time > to play with it this weekend, but I'll work on it tonight some. Ignore the crass attitude of certain boorish responders, but do read the following sig, and the reference therein. After which you will be able to post intelligible articles. -- If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, ensure you quote enough for the article to make sense. Google is only an interface to Usenet; it's not Usenet itself. Don't assume your readers can, or ever will, see any previous articles. More details at: <http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/> -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
| |||
| On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 22:06:46 -0400, CBFalconer wrote: > Ignore the crass attitude of certain boorish responders, but do > read the following sig, and the reference therein. After which you > will be able to post intelligible articles. The OP would do well to ignore the advice of folks like this one, who post from Windoze, and have two signature blocks, which results in one broken signature block. It's almost funny if you can get past the pathetic-ness of it. -- "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". |
| |||
| On Apr 2, 11:14 pm, Dan C <youmustbejok...@lan.invalid> wrote: > On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 22:06:46 -0400, CBFalconer wrote: > > Ignore the crass attitude of certain boorish responders, but do > > read the following sig, and the reference therein. After which you > > will be able to post intelligible articles. > > The OP would do well to ignore the advice of folks like this one, who post > from Windoze, and have two signature blocks, which results in one broken > signature block. It's almost funny if you can get past the pathetic-ness > of it. > > -- > "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". Actually, he was right. I am on Google, and forgot that not everyone can see that my working on "it" meant working on getting the PPTP VPN working (even though that is the title of this discussion...) I was trying not to repost a lot of repeated info again, and forgot that not everyone can see all the previous conversations. I apologize. I'm using Windows for now, and am trying to obtain the Slackware 11 DVD to install onto this computer soon (dialup sucks for that kind of thing). And, even if I weren't installing it, my choice of operating system has nothing to do with my intelligence, I use what I can do to what I need to do. For some things I do, I need Windows. For other things, I need Linux. Now, when the entire rest of the world adopts Linux, I'll gladly wipe the Windows partition off this computer forever and ever. Until then, I need it to test things out before sending them to people, so if it does screw something up royally, I've only FUBAR'd myself, and not someone who is paying me money. And as a final note to Dan C, I don't appreciate being called a dimwit. I am still very new to Usenet's, and trying to learn as fast as possible, but I will make mistakes. I usually admit to them, and try to learn from them and go on, but when people automatically form biased opinions based on what they *think* they know, it just gets under my skin. If you'd kindly not assume I'm a dimwit for using Windows because I need to, I'll return the favor and not assume your some ignoramus who has nothing better to do than troll forums and try to make fun of people and use "clever" words like "Windoze" and "pathetic-ness". If you want people to take you seriously, please, at least attempt to act in a way so we can. To anyone still interested in the Original Topic: I am currently searching for a solution on Google, but am still having trouble finding any solutions searching for the terms "iptables GRE". Is there anything more specific I should be looking for, or should I keep digging away at these? |
| ||||
| mleo2003 <mleo2003@gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 2, 11:14 pm, Dan C <youmustbejok...@lan.invalid> wrote: >> The OP would do well to ignore the advice of folks like this one, >> who post from Windoze, and have two signature blocks, which >> results in one broken signature block. It's almost funny if you >> can get past the pathetic-ness of it. >> >> -- "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard >> for me". > Actually, he was right. I am on Google, and forgot that not > everyone can see that my working on "it" meant working on getting > the PPTP VPN working (even though that is the title of this > discussion...) I was trying not to repost a lot of repeated info > again, and forgot that not everyone can see all the previous > conversations. I apologize. Never apologize to Dan C. Dan C is easily the biggest asshole that posts to this newsgroup. The only thing he adds is flamage and most of that goes to what he calls "newbies" because those who are new to linux are the only people that he knows more about linux. You would be wise to simply killfile Dan C until you know more about linux than he (and that won't take long - one install should do it) and then you can laugh at him like the rest of us do. cordially, as always, rm |