This is a discussion on Automatic update from Slackware 11 to current or 12? within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Any body know that this is possible? I need some thing that will automatic update to current version or ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| |||
| Condor <condor@stz-bg.com> wrote: > Any body know that this is possible? > I need some thing that will automatic update to current version or > automatic update from slackware 11 to slackware 12. If you need a near automatic update, we suggest windoze. Slackware is a hobbyist distribution and manual updates are a high point in the hobbyist's life. cordially, as always, rm |
| |||
| If you want to automatically track slackware-current that is possible using slapt-get. It works well. If you want to upgrade from 11 to 12 (when it's released) I suggest reading the UPGRADE.TXT file that will be distributed with the release version. As for the comment from the Windoze moron, forget him. With Slackware you can upgrade major versions if you can read. No one in their right mind suggests that upgrading from one major Windows version to the next is wise. It's always reinstall the new version. I've been upgrading my Slackware box since it was installed with 8.1. "Condor" <condor@stz-bg.com> wrote in message news:1175755564.956403.286110@y80g2000hsf.googlegr oups.com... > Any body know that this is possible? > I need some thing that will automatic update to current version or > automatic update from slackware 11 to slackware 12. > |
| |||
| On Thu, 4 Apr 2007, Condor wrote: > Subject(!): Automatic update from Slackware 11 to current or 12? > > Any body know that this is possible? > I need some thing that will automatic update to current version or You can try slackpkg (configure it to upgrade to "Slackware current" or "Slackware 11"), it upgrades OK. > automatic update from slackware 11 to slackware 12. Slackware 12 is not released. PW |
| |||
| Condor <condor@stz-bg.com> wrote: >Any body know that this is possible? >I need some thing that will automatic update to current version or >automatic update from slackware 11 to slackware 12. I understand slapt-get is supposed to do this, but I've never been gutsy enough to try it. (You're going to have to fix up your conf files in any case.) Swaret is a similar program, IIRC. There was another tool called autoslack--I'm pretty sure it's not being worked on anymore. (Caveat: I haven't checked the dev status of any of these tools in a long time, nor have I used any of them on a consistent basis.) -Beej |
| |||
| Condor wrote: > Any body know that this is possible? > I need some thing that will automatic update to current version > or automatic update from slackware 11 to slackware 12. Sure, but read the Changes_and_Hints.txt, and UPGRADE.txt since slack current includes some major changes to the file system layout, new packages and splitting of packages into new locations. Tools for automatic upgrading are slackpkg, swaret and slapt-get. Swaret is currently looking for a new maintainer, but proved to be very reliable in the past and has the best package exclude feature. Slapt-get is a frontend to pkgtools and provides a lot of options. The --dist-upgrade option is a good way to make sure that all base packages required by a new slack version will be installed. Currently I'm using slackpkg, it's the native package tool for slackware. IMO the dialog interface provides the best control over the installation process. All tools need some configuration, but correctly configured they make updates very easy. HTH Joerg -- For email use g m x d o t n e t |
| |||
| On 2007-04-05, Joerg <jstadermann@see_signature.net> wrote: > > Sure, but read the Changes_and_Hints.txt, and UPGRADE.txt since > slack current includes some major changes to the file system > layout, new packages and splitting of packages into new > locations. Yes, very good advice. At the moment, UPGRADE.TXT is a link to CHANGES_AND_HINTS.TXT in the -current tree, as the information needed for an upgrade to -current is covered in C&H. > Tools for automatic upgrading are slackpkg, swaret and slapt-get. > Swaret is currently looking for a new maintainer, but proved to > be very reliable in the past and has the best package exclude feature. Wow. Apparently I've been reading different forums and IRC channels than you have. The term "reliable" is not one that I have associated with swaret. [1] > Slapt-get is a frontend to pkgtools and provides a lot of options. > The --dist-upgrade option is a good way to make sure that all base > packages required by a new slack version will be installed. Yeah, that makes sure all of the A series is installed. Granted, that might ensure that you have a bootable system, but that's not worth a crap when apache stops working due to the missing mm package from the L series (which was the case in an upgrade from 10.2 to 11.0). > Currently I'm using slackpkg, it's the native package tool <SNIP> Um, no, it's not. Slackware's native package manager is the suite of things included with pkgtool(8) - installpkg(8), removepkg(8), upgradepkg(8), explodepkg(8), and makepkg(8). One *big* advantage of slackpkg is the fact that it will syncronize your system's installed packages with the official packages present on whatever mirror you selected. If I had to choose an automated tool to recommend, it would most definitely be slackpkg. The maintainer of slackpkg is a frequent contributor to Slackware - grep the ChangeLogs for PiterPunk That being said, the footnote below applies to it just as it does to any of the others. [1] I'd guess that a fair amount of the errors that people encounter when using *any* automatic upgrade tool are due to PEBKAC. It seems that the best way to keep information undiscovered is to place it in a manual page or a file named README. RW |
| |||
| Robby Workman wrote: > On 2007-04-05, Joerg <jstadermann@see_signature.net> wrote: <snip> >> >> Tools for automatic upgrading are slackpkg, swaret and >> slapt-get. Swaret is currently looking for a new maintainer, >> but proved to be very reliable in the past and has the best >> package exclude feature. > > > Wow. Apparently I've been reading different forums and IRC > channels > than you have. The term "reliable" is not one that I have > associated with swaret. [1] > > Why reading, I' ve been using it until recently and it it did a good job. It's only because of the open maintenence issue that I'm looking into alternatives. <snip> Joerg -- For email use g m x d o t n e t |
| ||||
| Joerg wrote : > Why reading, I' ve been using it until recently and it it did a > good job. Then you are more lucky than many others. There's a reason for Robby's comment and that is we've seen quite a number of people coming to this group with a cry for help because their use of swaret has left them with a totally FUBAR'red slackbox. -- Thomas O. This area is designed to become quite warm during normal operation. |