This is a discussion on Damn Small Slackware? within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Does anybody know if there is a similar project to Damn Small Linux, but Slackware based? I'm thinking about ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Does anybody know if there is a similar project to Damn Small Linux, but Slackware based? I'm thinking about the "run everything in ram" thing here and the reduction in required HDD space etc. (Yeah, guess what I've been playing with? -- All the world is a stage. You'll grow out of it. We all do, eventually. |
| |||
| Mike wrote: > Does anybody know if there is a similar project to Damn > Small Linux, but Slackware based? I'm thinking about the > "run everything in ram" thing here and the reduction in > required HDD space etc. (Yeah, guess what I've been playing > with? <http://www.slax.org>? -- Joost Kremers joostkremers@yahoo.com Selbst in die Unterwelt dringt durch Spalten Licht EN:SiS(9) |
| |||
| Apr 20: Responding to Joost Kremers... > > > Mike wrote: >> Does anybody know if there is a similar project to Damn >> Small Linux, but Slackware based? I'm thinking about the >> "run everything in ram" thing here and the reduction in >> required HDD space etc. (Yeah, guess what I've been playing >> with? > > <http://www.slax.org>? > Neat! I'll read this up tommorrow. The cat wants my chair right now. -- All the world is a stage. You'll grow out of it. We all do, eventually. |
| |||
| On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 23:50:42 GMT, in alt.os.linux.slackware you wrote: >Apr 20: Responding to Joost Kremers... > >> >> >> Mike wrote: >>> Does anybody know if there is a similar project to Damn >>> Small Linux, but Slackware based? I'm thinking about the >>> "run everything in ram" thing here and the reduction in >>> required HDD space etc. (Yeah, guess what I've been playing >>> with? >> >> <http://www.slax.org>? >> > >Neat! I'll read this up tommorrow. The cat wants my chair >right now. I've used Slax live CD's before i finally made the switch to Slackware Linux, it's quite nice. When you use the live CD, it has option to load everything into RAM, among other options. If remember well, you can also install it to disk. The web site is quite clear in navigation, so you would have found it anyway, but here's a link: http://www.slax.org/cheatcodes.php |
| |||
| Apr 21: Responding to Manuel Otto... > > > On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 23:50:42 GMT, in alt.os.linux.slackware you wrote: > >> Apr 20: Responding to Joost Kremers... >> >>> >>> >>> Mike wrote: >>>> Does anybody know if there is a similar project to Damn >>>> Small Linux, but Slackware based? I'm thinking about the >>>> "run everything in ram" thing here and the reduction in >>>> required HDD space etc. (Yeah, guess what I've been playing >>>> with? >>> >>> <http://www.slax.org>? >>> >> >> Neat! I'll read this up tommorrow. The cat wants my chair >> right now. > > I've used Slax live CD's before i finally made the switch to Slackware > Linux, it's quite nice. > > When you use the live CD, it has option to load everything into RAM, > among other options. > > If remember well, you can also install it to disk. > > The web site is quite clear in navigation, so you would have found it > anyway, but here's a link: > > http://www.slax.org/cheatcodes.php > Yup. Got there. This looks like something I'd be really interested in. The fun never stops with Slackware. -- All the world is a stage. You'll grow out of it. We all do, eventually. |
| |||
| Mike wrote: >Does anybody know if there is a similar project to Damn >Small Linux, but Slackware based? I'm thinking about the >"run everything in ram" thing here and the reduction in >required HDD space etc. (Yeah, guess what I've been playing >with? In addition to the good suggestions others have made, there exists an even smaller Slackware-based distribution for those who consider Damn Small Linux to be bloatware; BasicLinux. It has two versions: Minimum RAM version minimum requirements: 386 CPU 4Mb RAM 16MB HDD NO Floppy required. Minimum Ddisk space version minimum requirements: 386 CPU 12MB RAM (runs entirely in RAM Disk) Two 1.44 mb floppy diskettes One 1.44 MB FDD (two if you don't want to swap during boot) NO Hard drive required. Look here for more info: http://freshmeat.net/projects/baslinux/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BasicLinux http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/...ions/baslinux/ http://basiclinux.com.ru/ http://www.volny.cz/basiclinux/oldpc/ http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/baslinux/ http://www.google.com/search?q=%22ba...basic+linux%22 In case anyone is interested in a small computer to run a small Linux distribution, there is one that is 55mm x 22mm (2.2 inches x 0.9 inches). look here: http://linuxdevices.com/news/NS6270733703.html http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT8498487406.html -- Guy Macon <http://www.guymacon.com/> |
| |||
| Guy Macon <http://www.guymacon.com/> wrote: > In case anyone is interested in a small computer to run a small > Linux distribution, there is one that is 55mm x 22mm (2.2 inches > x 0.9 inches). From all reports by your friends at the gym, that sounds about the same size as your dick. Does it sound bigger when you give the size in metric? Why don't you bugger off on out of here, you fat pig? Macon, bacon, ooze... cordially, as always, rm |
| |||
| rm@biteme.org wrote: > Guy Macon <http://www.guymacon.com/> wrote: > >> In case anyone is interested in a small computer to run a small >> Linux distribution, there is one that is 55mm x 22mm (2.2 inches >> x 0.9 inches). > > From all reports by your friends at the gym, that sounds about the > same size as your dick. Does it sound bigger when you give the size > in metric? > > Why don't you bugger off on out of here, you fat pig? Macon, bacon, > ooze... Here's a picture of the phat phuck: http://www.guymacon.com/INDEX.HTM Once he told us that he and his friends at the gym stand around laughing at us because we describe him as fat. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Macon Bacon is a "self-taught engineer." That's right. Self-taught, as in high school dropout. This means he can't wear the ring on his finger but he has to wear it on his nose... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!! cordially, as always, rm |
| |||
| Apr 22: Responding to Guy Macon... > > > > > > Mike wrote: > >> Does anybody know if there is a similar project to Damn >> Small Linux, but Slackware based? I'm thinking about the >> "run everything in ram" thing here and the reduction in >> required HDD space etc. (Yeah, guess what I've been playing >> with? > > In addition to the good suggestions others have made, > there exists an even smaller Slackware-based distribution > for those who consider Damn Small Linux to be bloatware; > BasicLinux. It has two versions: > > > Minimum RAM version minimum requirements: > > 386 CPU > 4Mb RAM > 16MB HDD > NO Floppy required. > [SNIP] Looks fun, but maybe a little TOO small for me. I like the idea of a customisable live-cd that can be handed to someone as a "Try that!" thing. CDROMs are WAAAAAY more impressive than floppies. -- All the world is a stage. You'll grow out of it. We all do, eventually. |
| ||||
| Mike <Not@arizona.bay> wrote: > Apr 22: Responding to Guy Macon... > [SNIP] > > Looks fun, but maybe a little TOO small for me. I like the > idea of a customisable live-cd that can be handed to someone > as a "Try that!" thing. CDROMs are WAAAAAY more impressive > than floppies. Linux on a floppy is about all the linux that Phat Boy can handle. He hasn't upgraded to cdroms yet, anyway. cordially, as always, rm |