This is a discussion on Accepting wildcards like % in input parameters of stored procedures within the SQL Server forums, part of the Microsoft SQL Server category; --> From a security point of view, is accepting wildcards like "%" in input parameters of stored procedures against any ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| From a security point of view, is accepting wildcards like "%" in input parameters of stored procedures against any best practices? As an example, if a user defined function uses "Productname LIKE @ProductName" in WHERE clause of a select statement, and a stored procedure uses the user defined function while passing @ProductName input parameter to the user defined function, is there any security risks? Is there a better way to construct the search string while not limiting the flexibility of using wildcards? Thanks |
| |||
| >> From a security point of view, is accepting wildcards like "%" in input parameters of stored procedures against any best practices? << It should be fine. You are putting the pattern in a parameter and not using dynamic SQL. |
| |||
| nidaar (nidaar@gmail.com) writes: > From a security point of view, is accepting wildcards like "%" in > input parameters of stored procedures against any best practices? > > As an example, if a user defined function uses "Productname LIKE > @ProductName" in WHERE clause of a select statement, and a stored > procedure uses the user defined function while passing @ProductName > input parameter to the user defined function, is there any security > risks? Is there a better way to construct the search string while not > limiting the flexibility of using wildcards? As long as you are only working with parameters and don't engange in dynamic SQL there is no risk for SQL injection, if that is what you have in mind. There may be other security risks, like disclosure of information that the user does not have right to see, but that is not as such affected by the use of %. The one thing I would have in mind with wildcard search is that there is a big difference between initial wildcards and wildcards that comes later. An initial wildcard does not go well with the index, so for larger data volumes, you should prevent the user from using initial wildcards, or at least lead initial wildcards into a code path on its own. -- Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...ads/books.mspx Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinf...ons/books.mspx |
| |||
| From security stand point it does not make a difference if you concatenate the wildcards on the client and pass the whole search value as parameter, or if you concatenate it in the stored procedure: WHERE Productname LIKE '%' + @ProductName + '%' For many applications I have used a screen drop down with values like 'Begins', 'Contains', 'Ends with', 'Equals' and then based on user selection build the correct search pattern. Plamen Ratchev http://www.SQLStudio.com |
| |||
| On Jul 29, 5:25*pm, "Plamen Ratchev" <Pla...@SQLStudio.com> wrote: > From security stand point it does not make a difference if you concatenate > the wildcards on the client and pass the whole search value as parameter,or > if you concatenate it in the stored procedure: > > WHERE Productname LIKE '%' + @ProductName + '%' > > For many applications I have used a screen drop down with values like > 'Begins', 'Contains', 'Ends with', 'Equals' and then based on user selection > build the correct search pattern. > > Plamen Ratchevhttp://www.SQLStudio.com Thanks for all the prompt replies. Much appreciated. |
| ||||
| According to this MSDN article you might consider escaping the wildcard characters in a like clause. FROM: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms161953.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------- LIKE Clauses Note that if you are using a LIKE clause, wildcard characters still must be escaped: .... s = s.Replace("[", "[[]"); s = s.Replace("%", "[%]"); s = s.Replace("_", "[_]"); ------------------------------------------------------------- I suppose the logic for escaping these characters is that if you request that the user supplies 3 characters for a like match in the UI, they can't just key ___ or %%% and have it return all the results still. That's a very minor example of SQL Injection where the results returned might be unanticipated by the developers. By escaping them with [%] or [_] it actually searches for text that is like the real percent and underscore characters as opposed to the wildcard affect they have in the LIKE clause. -Eric Isaacs |