This is a discussion on Re: Solaris 8 12/02 within the Sun Solaris Administration forums, part of the Solaris Operating System category; --> In article <49f0fa5e.0308201430.72e0af36@posting.google.com >, compgeek_ 007@yahoo.com says... > I have been told that it is bad to use 12/02 ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| In article <49f0fa5e.0308201430.72e0af36@posting.google.com >, compgeek_ 007@yahoo.com says... > I have been told that it is bad to use 12/02 on some sun hardware. I > have also been told that it is ok to use. Specifically I am > installing on Blade 2000 and SunFire 280R, SunFire v880. Is it true > or false that it is a bad idea to install 12/02, and use 02/02 > instead? I understand that 12/02 is a hardware release, but in the > supported platform guide for 12/02 that it is ok to install on all of > these boxes. Can someone set me straight on this, I am installing on > over 60 boxes with LOTS of other software, I would like to know before > if this is a bad idea, or if it is ok. To rephrase your question: You're wondering if 12/02 is supported on systems for which the stated minimum version is 2/02. Since 12/02 follows 2/02, I would think so. But I'm only 99% certain. (Then again, I'm rarely more than 99% certain of anything.) |